[PATCH v9 01/10] sched: add utilization_avg_contrib
Vincent Guittot
vincent.guittot at linaro.org
Mon Nov 24 06:04:15 PST 2014
On 21 November 2014 at 13:34, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen at arm.com> wrote:
> Should the subject mention that the patch adds utilization tracking?
> Maybe: 'sched: Add utilization tracking' ?
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:54:38PM +0000, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Add new statistics which reflect the average time a task is running on the CPU
>> and the sum of these running time of the tasks on a runqueue. The latter is
>> named utilization_load_avg.
>>
>> This patch is based on the usage metric that was proposed in the 1st
>> versions of the per-entity load tracking patchset by Paul Turner
>
> Should we do ourselves and anybody else who feels like going through the
> pain of understanding the load-tracking code a favor and drop the use of
> the term 'usage' and use 'utilization' everywhere instead? 'usage' isn't
> clearly defined anywhere.
>
> Referring to 'usage' here in the reference to original patch is fine,
> but I suggest that we remove it from the code and comment on subsequent
> patches unless there is a very good reason to keep it.
As discussed with Peter, we use usage when the task's utilization has
been scaled by the capacity.
IIRC from one of our discussion, dietmar should prepare a patchset to
rename and aligned variables and field.
Regards,
Vincent
>
>> <pjt at google.com> but that has be removed afterwards. This version differs from
>> the original one in the sense that it's not linked to task_group.
>>
>> The rq's utilization_load_avg will be used to check if a rq is overloaded or
>> not instead of trying to compute how many tasks a group of CPUs can handle.
>>
>> Rename runnable_avg_period into avg_period as it is now used with both
>> runnable_avg_sum and running_avg_sum
>>
>> Add some descriptions of the variables to explain their differences
>>
>> cc: Paul Turner <pjt at google.com>
>> cc: Ben Segall <bsegall at google.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> include/linux/sched.h | 21 ++++++++++++---
>> kernel/sched/debug.c | 10 ++++---
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> kernel/sched/sched.h | 8 +++++-
>> 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
>> index 18f5262..b576b29 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>> @@ -1071,15 +1071,28 @@ struct load_weight {
>> };
>>
>> struct sched_avg {
>> + u64 last_runnable_update;
>> + s64 decay_count;
>> + /*
>> + * utilization_avg_contrib describes the amount of time that a
>> + * sched_entity is running on a CPU. It is based on running_avg_sum
>> + * and is scaled in the range [0..SCHED_LOAD_SCALE].
>> + * load_avg_contrib described the amount of time that a sched_entity
>> + * is runnable on a rq. It is based on both runnable_avg_sum and the
>> + * weight of the task.
>> + */
>> + unsigned long load_avg_contrib, utilization_avg_contrib;
>> /*
>> * These sums represent an infinite geometric series and so are bound
>> * above by 1024/(1-y). Thus we only need a u32 to store them for all
>> * choices of y < 1-2^(-32)*1024.
>> + * running_avg_sum reflects the time that the sched_entity is
>> + * effectively running on the CPU.
>> + * runnable_avg_sum represents the amount of time a sched_entity is on
>> + * a runqueue which includes the running time that is monitored by
>> + * running_avg_sum.
>
> i.e. runnable_avg_sum = running_avg_sum + 'waiting time'
>
>> */
>> - u32 runnable_avg_sum, runnable_avg_period;
>> - u64 last_runnable_update;
>> - s64 decay_count;
>> - unsigned long load_avg_contrib;
>> + u32 runnable_avg_sum, avg_period, running_avg_sum;
>> };
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
>> index ce33780..f384452 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
>> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct task_group
>> if (!se) {
>> struct sched_avg *avg = &cpu_rq(cpu)->avg;
>> P(avg->runnable_avg_sum);
>> - P(avg->runnable_avg_period);
>> + P(avg->avg_period);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct task_group
>> P(se->load.weight);
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> P(se->avg.runnable_avg_sum);
>> - P(se->avg.runnable_avg_period);
>> + P(se->avg.avg_period);
>> P(se->avg.load_avg_contrib);
>> P(se->avg.decay_count);
>> #endif
>> @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>> cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg);
>> SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "blocked_load_avg",
>> cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg);
>> + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "utilization_load_avg",
>> + cfs_rq->utilization_load_avg);
>> #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
>> SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "tg_load_contrib",
>> cfs_rq->tg_load_contrib);
>> @@ -628,8 +630,10 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m)
>> P(se.load.weight);
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> P(se.avg.runnable_avg_sum);
>> - P(se.avg.runnable_avg_period);
>> + P(se.avg.running_avg_sum);
>> + P(se.avg.avg_period);
>> P(se.avg.load_avg_contrib);
>> + P(se.avg.utilization_avg_contrib);
>> P(se.avg.decay_count);
>> #endif
>> P(policy);
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index bd61cff..3a91ae6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -670,6 +670,7 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int cpu);
>> static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p);
>>
>> static inline void __update_task_entity_contrib(struct sched_entity *se);
>> +static inline void __update_task_entity_utilization(struct sched_entity *se);
>>
>> /* Give new task start runnable values to heavy its load in infant time */
>> void init_task_runnable_average(struct task_struct *p)
>> @@ -678,9 +679,10 @@ void init_task_runnable_average(struct task_struct *p)
>>
>> p->se.avg.decay_count = 0;
>> slice = sched_slice(task_cfs_rq(p), &p->se) >> 10;
>> - p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum = slice;
>> - p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period = slice;
>> + p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum = p->se.avg.running_avg_sum = slice;
>> + p->se.avg.avg_period = slice;
>> __update_task_entity_contrib(&p->se);
>> + __update_task_entity_utilization(&p->se);
>> }
>> #else
>> void init_task_runnable_average(struct task_struct *p)
>> @@ -1548,7 +1550,7 @@ static u64 numa_get_avg_runtime(struct task_struct *p, u64 *period)
>> *period = now - p->last_task_numa_placement;
>> } else {
>> delta = p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum;
>> - *period = p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period;
>> + *period = p->se.avg.avg_period;
>> }
>>
>> p->last_sum_exec_runtime = runtime;
>> @@ -2294,7 +2296,8 @@ static u32 __compute_runnable_contrib(u64 n)
>> */
>> static __always_inline int __update_entity_runnable_avg(u64 now,
>> struct sched_avg *sa,
>> - int runnable)
>> + int runnable,
>> + int running)
>> {
>> u64 delta, periods;
>> u32 runnable_contrib;
>> @@ -2320,7 +2323,7 @@ static __always_inline int __update_entity_runnable_avg(u64 now,
>> sa->last_runnable_update = now;
>>
>> /* delta_w is the amount already accumulated against our next period */
>> - delta_w = sa->runnable_avg_period % 1024;
>> + delta_w = sa->avg_period % 1024;
>> if (delta + delta_w >= 1024) {
>> /* period roll-over */
>> decayed = 1;
>> @@ -2333,7 +2336,9 @@ static __always_inline int __update_entity_runnable_avg(u64 now,
>> delta_w = 1024 - delta_w;
>> if (runnable)
>> sa->runnable_avg_sum += delta_w;
>> - sa->runnable_avg_period += delta_w;
>> + if (running)
>> + sa->running_avg_sum += delta_w;
>> + sa->avg_period += delta_w;
>>
>> delta -= delta_w;
>>
>> @@ -2343,20 +2348,26 @@ static __always_inline int __update_entity_runnable_avg(u64 now,
>>
>> sa->runnable_avg_sum = decay_load(sa->runnable_avg_sum,
>> periods + 1);
>> - sa->runnable_avg_period = decay_load(sa->runnable_avg_period,
>> + sa->running_avg_sum = decay_load(sa->running_avg_sum,
>> + periods + 1);
>> + sa->avg_period = decay_load(sa->avg_period,
>> periods + 1);
>>
>> /* Efficiently calculate \sum (1..n_period) 1024*y^i */
>> runnable_contrib = __compute_runnable_contrib(periods);
>> if (runnable)
>> sa->runnable_avg_sum += runnable_contrib;
>> - sa->runnable_avg_period += runnable_contrib;
>> + if (running)
>> + sa->running_avg_sum += runnable_contrib;
>> + sa->avg_period += runnable_contrib;
>> }
>>
>> /* Remainder of delta accrued against u_0` */
>> if (runnable)
>> sa->runnable_avg_sum += delta;
>> - sa->runnable_avg_period += delta;
>> + if (running)
>> + sa->running_avg_sum += delta;
>> + sa->avg_period += delta;
>>
>> return decayed;
>> }
>> @@ -2372,6 +2383,8 @@ static inline u64 __synchronize_entity_decay(struct sched_entity *se)
>> return 0;
>>
>> se->avg.load_avg_contrib = decay_load(se->avg.load_avg_contrib, decays);
>> + se->avg.utilization_avg_contrib =
>> + decay_load(se->avg.utilization_avg_contrib, decays);
>> se->avg.decay_count = 0;
>>
>> return decays;
>> @@ -2408,7 +2421,7 @@ static inline void __update_tg_runnable_avg(struct sched_avg *sa,
>>
>> /* The fraction of a cpu used by this cfs_rq */
>> contrib = div_u64((u64)sa->runnable_avg_sum << NICE_0_SHIFT,
>> - sa->runnable_avg_period + 1);
>> + sa->avg_period + 1);
>> contrib -= cfs_rq->tg_runnable_contrib;
>>
>> if (abs(contrib) > cfs_rq->tg_runnable_contrib / 64) {
>> @@ -2461,7 +2474,8 @@ static inline void __update_group_entity_contrib(struct sched_entity *se)
>>
>> static inline void update_rq_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq, int runnable)
>> {
>> - __update_entity_runnable_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), &rq->avg, runnable);
>> + __update_entity_runnable_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), &rq->avg, runnable,
>> + runnable);
>> __update_tg_runnable_avg(&rq->avg, &rq->cfs);
>> }
>> #else /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>> @@ -2479,7 +2493,7 @@ static inline void __update_task_entity_contrib(struct sched_entity *se)
>>
>> /* avoid overflowing a 32-bit type w/ SCHED_LOAD_SCALE */
>> contrib = se->avg.runnable_avg_sum * scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
>> - contrib /= (se->avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
>> + contrib /= (se->avg.avg_period + 1);
>> se->avg.load_avg_contrib = scale_load(contrib);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -2498,6 +2512,27 @@ static long __update_entity_load_avg_contrib(struct sched_entity *se)
>> return se->avg.load_avg_contrib - old_contrib;
>> }
>>
>> +
>> +static inline void __update_task_entity_utilization(struct sched_entity *se)
>> +{
>> + u32 contrib;
>> +
>> + /* avoid overflowing a 32-bit type w/ SCHED_LOAD_SCALE */
>> + contrib = se->avg.running_avg_sum * scale_load_down(SCHED_LOAD_SCALE);
>> + contrib /= (se->avg.avg_period + 1);
>> + se->avg.utilization_avg_contrib = scale_load(contrib);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long __update_entity_utilization_avg_contrib(struct sched_entity *se)
>> +{
>> + long old_contrib = se->avg.utilization_avg_contrib;
>> +
>> + if (entity_is_task(se))
>> + __update_task_entity_utilization(se);
>> +
>> + return se->avg.utilization_avg_contrib - old_contrib;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline void subtract_blocked_load_contrib(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
>> long load_contrib)
>> {
>> @@ -2514,7 +2549,7 @@ static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se,
>> int update_cfs_rq)
>> {
>> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>> - long contrib_delta;
>> + long contrib_delta, utilization_delta;
>> u64 now;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2526,18 +2561,22 @@ static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se,
>> else
>> now = cfs_rq_clock_task(group_cfs_rq(se));
>>
>> - if (!__update_entity_runnable_avg(now, &se->avg, se->on_rq))
>> + if (!__update_entity_runnable_avg(now, &se->avg, se->on_rq,
>> + cfs_rq->curr == se))
>> return;
>>
>> contrib_delta = __update_entity_load_avg_contrib(se);
>> + utilization_delta = __update_entity_utilization_avg_contrib(se);
>>
>> if (!update_cfs_rq)
>> return;
>>
>> - if (se->on_rq)
>> + if (se->on_rq) {
>> cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg += contrib_delta;
>> - else
>> + cfs_rq->utilization_load_avg += utilization_delta;
>> + } else {
>> subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq, -contrib_delta);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2612,6 +2651,7 @@ static inline void enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
>> }
>>
>> cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg += se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
>> + cfs_rq->utilization_load_avg += se->avg.utilization_avg_contrib;
>> /* we force update consideration on load-balancer moves */
>> update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq, !wakeup);
>> }
>> @@ -2630,6 +2670,7 @@ static inline void dequeue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
>> update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq, !sleep);
>>
>> cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg -= se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
>> + cfs_rq->utilization_load_avg -= se->avg.utilization_avg_contrib;
>> if (sleep) {
>> cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg += se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
>> se->avg.decay_count = atomic64_read(&cfs_rq->decay_counter);
>> @@ -2967,6 +3008,7 @@ set_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
>> */
>> update_stats_wait_end(cfs_rq, se);
>> __dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
>> + update_entity_load_avg(se, 1);
>> }
>>
>> update_stats_curr_start(cfs_rq, se);
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> index 6130251..c34bd11 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> @@ -343,8 +343,14 @@ struct cfs_rq {
>> * Under CFS, load is tracked on a per-entity basis and aggregated up.
>> * This allows for the description of both thread and group usage (in
>> * the FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case).
>> + * runnable_load_avg is the sum of the load_avg_contrib of the
>> + * sched_entities on the rq.
>> + * blocked_load_avg is similar to runnable_load_avg except that its
>> + * the blocked sched_entities on the rq.
>
> This is slightly misleading. Blocked entities are not on the rq. Maybe
> say: "... except it is the blocked sched_entities associated with the
> rq." ?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list