[PATCH v5 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5440: move restart code into clock driver

[Kukjin Kim]

Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> 
> Hi Kukjin,
> 
Hi,

> On Thursday 20 November 2014 11:18 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 19/11/14 04:37, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> +static int exynos5440_clk_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
> >>>>>> +		unsigned long code, void *unused)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> +	u32 val, status;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +	status = readl_relaxed(reg_base + 0xbc);
> >>>>>> +	val = readl_relaxed(reg_base + 0xcc);
> >>>>>> +	val = (val & 0xffff0000) | (status & 0xffff);
> >>>>>> +	writel_relaxed(val, reg_base + 0xcc);
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we have macro definitions for these 0xcc, 0xbc address offsets ?
> >>>> I must say I couldn't find them documented in any Exynos datasheet I've
> >> got though.
> >>>>
> >>
> >> I also wished this, but I could not find them documented.
> >> So I tried to keep logic of original code as it is, just changed location.
> >> I would also like to mention that I have not tested this on exynos5440 as I
> >> do not have
> >> one with me. I believe if it was working at its original place in
> >> exynos_restart it should work
> >> here also. Other patch (2/2) I have verified on Exynos3250 board and its
> >> working well.
> >
> > I think it's best to merge both patches in that series through
> > the arm-soc tree, since applying them not in order may cause some
> > breakage. Thus I'd let Kukjin take this patch set into his tree.
> >
> > For both patches:
> > Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki at samsung.com>
> >
Sylwester, thanks for your ack.

> 
> Will you please take this series into your tree.
> 
+ Amit Daniel

Yeah, this series looks good to me and I'm looking at this series with Amit's
moving pmu.c into drivers/. Maybe I need to ask Amit to respin the series on
top of this? If required, I'll reply.

Thanks,
Kukjin