IRQ #0 broken on ARM

[Marc Zyngier]

Hi Russell,

On 21/11/14 11:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:52:37AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 21 2014 at 10:31:05 am GMT, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> After the commit a71b092a9c68685a270ebdde7b5986ba8787e575
>>> (ARM: Convert handle_IRQ to use __handle_domain_irq) IRQ #0 is broken
>>> on ARM. It is a valid IRQ and it is quite imporant (on sa1100 it's a GPIO0).
>>
>> Well, this is a valid IRQ number if you're not using irq domains. I may
>> be a bit pedantic here, but I thing this is an important distinction.
> 
> Linus has decreed it to not be a valid IRQ number, and that's basically
> the end of the discussion.  Generic code, and drivers, will increasingly
> decide that IRQ0 is not valid, and objecting to it has, and will continue
> to elicit a response of "fix ARM".

I'm fine with that.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...