[PATCH] PM / Domains: Power on the PM domain right after attach completes
stern at rowland.harvard.edu
Tue Nov 18 08:13:28 PST 2014
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > However, is it allowed to call pm_runtime_get_sync() on devices that
> > > didn't issue pm_runtime_enable()?
> > Yes. But the bus has to issue pm_runtime_enable() before probing the
> > driver, because the driver will expect runtime PM to work properly
> > while its probe routine runs. For example, the probe routine might
> > want to leave the device in a runtime-suspended state. It can't do
> > that if the device isn't enabled for runtime PM.
> That means that runtime PM will be enabled for all devices on given bus
> while up till now drivers were deciding if their devices should be
> runtime-pm-managed or not. I do not think we are quite ready for this.
It's up to both the bus _and_ the driver to make this decision.
If a driver is completely runtime-PM-unaware then it will never
decrement the device's usage counter (which was incremented when the
bus called _get_noresume()), and therefore the device will never be
More information about the linux-arm-kernel