[PATCH v4 01/19] arm/arm64: KVM: rework MPIDR assignment and add accessors
Eric Auger
eric.auger at linaro.org
Tue Nov 18 02:35:03 PST 2014
On 11/14/2014 11:07 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The virtual MPIDR registers (containing topology information) for the
> guest are currently mapped linearily to the vcpu_id. Improve this
> mapping for arm64 by using three levels to not artificially limit the
> number of vCPUs.
> To help this, change and rename the kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr() function to
> mask off the non-affinity bits in the MPIDR register.
> Also add an accessor to later allow easier access to a vCPU with a
> given MPIDR. Use this new accessor in the PSCI emulation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
> ---
> Changelog v3...v4:
> - rename kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr() to kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff()
> - simplify kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu()
> - fixup comment
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 5 +++--
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/arm/kvm/psci.c | 17 +++++------------
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 7 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index b9db269..3ae88ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmio.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
> +#include <asm/cputype.h>
>
> unsigned long *vcpu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num);
> unsigned long *vcpu_spsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -162,9 +163,9 @@ static inline u32 kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & HSR_HVC_IMM_MASK;
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static inline unsigned long kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - return vcpu->arch.cp15[c0_MPIDR];
> + return vcpu->arch.cp15[c0_MPIDR] & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
Hi Andre,
Can't we use a single naming here? aff or hwid
> }
>
> static inline void kvm_vcpu_set_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 53036e2..b443dfe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ static inline void vgic_arch_setup(const struct vgic_params *vgic)
> int kvm_perf_init(void);
> int kvm_perf_teardown(void);
>
> +struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
> +
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 9e193c8..c2a5c69 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -977,6 +977,19 @@ static void check_kvm_target_cpu(void *ret)
> *(int *)ret = kvm_target_cpu();
> }
>
> +struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> + int i;
> +
> + mpidr &= MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> + if (mpidr == kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(vcpu))
> + return vcpu;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * Initialize Hyp-mode and memory mappings on all CPUs.
> */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
> index 09cf377..84121b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include <asm/cputype.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_psci.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_host.h>
>
> /*
> * This is an implementation of the Power State Coordination Interface
> @@ -65,25 +66,17 @@ static void kvm_psci_vcpu_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm *kvm = source_vcpu->kvm;
> - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL, *tmp;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
> wait_queue_head_t *wq;
> unsigned long cpu_id;
> unsigned long context_id;
> - unsigned long mpidr;
> phys_addr_t target_pc;
> - int i;
>
> - cpu_id = *vcpu_reg(source_vcpu, 1);
> + cpu_id = *vcpu_reg(source_vcpu, 1) & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
> if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(source_vcpu))
> cpu_id &= ~((u32) 0);
>
> - kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, kvm) {
> - mpidr = kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr(tmp);
> - if ((mpidr & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK) == (cpu_id & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK)) {
> - vcpu = tmp;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> + vcpu = kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(kvm, cpu_id);
>
> /*
> * Make sure the caller requested a valid CPU and that the CPU is
> @@ -154,7 +147,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_affinity_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * then ON else OFF
> */
> kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, kvm) {
> - mpidr = kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr(tmp);
> + mpidr = kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(tmp);
> if (((mpidr & target_affinity_mask) == target_affinity) &&
> !tmp->arch.pause) {
> return PSCI_0_2_AFFINITY_LEVEL_ON;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index 5674a55..d4daaa5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmio.h>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> +#include <asm/cputype.h>
>
> unsigned long *vcpu_reg32(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num);
> unsigned long *vcpu_spsr32(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -182,9 +183,9 @@ static inline u8 kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault_type(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_EL2_FSC_TYPE;
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static inline unsigned long kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - return vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MPIDR_EL1);
> + return vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MPIDR_EL1) & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
> }
>
> static inline void kvm_vcpu_set_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 2012c4b..286bb61 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
> int kvm_perf_init(void);
> int kvm_perf_teardown(void);
>
> +struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
> +
> static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(phys_addr_t boot_pgd_ptr,
> phys_addr_t pgd_ptr,
> unsigned long hyp_stack_ptr,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 4cc3b71..fd3ffc3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -252,10 +252,17 @@ static void reset_amair_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>
> static void reset_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> {
> + u64 mpidr;
> +
> /*
> - * Simply map the vcpu_id into the Aff0 field of the MPIDR.
> + * Map the vcpu_id into the first three Aff fields of the MPIDR.
> + * We limit the number of VCPUs in Aff0 due to a limitation in the
> + * ICC_SGIxR registers of the GICv3.
> */
I had some difficulties to understand that comment. Is that limitation a
bug, a limitation bound to be fixed later? I found in the doc each
affinity level might have between 1 and 256 children. But target
a.b.c.{target list} for SGI is limited to 16 processors only. To me it
is clearer stated that way.
Best Regards
Eric
> - vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MPIDR_EL1) = (1UL << 31) | (vcpu->vcpu_id & 0xff);
> + mpidr = (vcpu->vcpu_id & 0x0f) << MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(0);
> + mpidr |= ((vcpu->vcpu_id >> 4) & 0xff) << MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(1);
> + mpidr |= ((vcpu->vcpu_id >> 12) & 0xff) << MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(2);
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MPIDR_EL1) = (1ULL << 31) | mpidr;
> }
>
> /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list