[PATCH 3/4] simplefb: Change simplefb_init from module_init to fs_initcall

Grant Likely grant.likely at linaro.org
Thu Nov 13 02:31:12 PST 2014


On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/13/2014 09:52 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:08:43PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> One of the reasons for having the simplefb nodes in /chosen, and doing
>>>> explicit enumeration of the nodes there, is too allow enumerating them sooner,
>>>> so that we get a console earlier on.
>>>>
>>>> Doing this earlier then fs_initcall is not useful, since the fb only turns into
>>>> a console when fbcon intializes, which is a fs_initcall too.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c | 6 +++++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>> index be7d288..8c0c972 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>> @@ -415,7 +415,11 @@ static void __exit simplefb_exit(void)
>>>>      platform_driver_unregister(&simplefb_driver);
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> -module_init(simplefb_init);
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * While this can be a module, if builtin it's most likely the console
>>>> + * So let's leave module_exit but move module_init to an earlier place
>>>> + */
>>>
>>> Not really related to this patch itself, but do we want to support
>>> simplefb as a module? It seems like it's going to be most of the time
>>> broken.
>>
>> A valid point, my mean reasoning here is that some may see not being able to
>> use it as a module as a regression, so I just kept things as is, but I do
>> agree that it is advisable to just build it in.
>
> Like a lot of things, if it is made a modules, and it breaks for the
> user, the user gets to keep the pieces. There are potentially some
> valid scenarios where it is fine to have it as a module. I don't
> recommend changing this unless is actually starts causing problems.

I assume that you've tested this and it actually makes a difference,
correct? If so,

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at linaro.org>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list