[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff related properties

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 11/13/2014 09:38 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Since simplefb nodes do not relate directly to hw typically they have been
>> placed in the root of the devicetree. As the represent runtime information
>> having them as sub-nodes of /chosen is more logical, specify this.
>>
>> Also specify when to set the chosen stdout-path property to a simplefb node.
>>
>> For reliable handover to a hardware specific driver, that driver needs to
>> know which simplefb to unregister when taking over, specify how the hw driver
>> can find the matching simplefb node.
>>
>> Last add some advice on how to fill and use simplefb nodes from a firmware
>> pov.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org>

Thanks.

> 
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/video/simple-framebuffer.txt          | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer.txt
>> index 8f35718..95fe284 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer.txt
>> @@ -4,6 +4,26 @@ A simple frame-buffer describes a frame-buffer setup by firmware or
>>  the bootloader, with the assumption that the display hardware has already
>>  been set up to scan out from the memory pointed to by the reg property.
>>
>> +Since simplefb nodes represent runtime information they must be sub-nodes of
>> +the chosen node (*). The primary display node must be named framebuffer0,
>> +additional nodes must be called framebuffer1, etc.
>> +
>> +If a simplefb node represents the preferred console for user interaction,
>> +then the chosen node's stdout-path property must point to it.
> 
> You may want to add an stdout-path property to the example.

That is a good idea, done for v2.

Regards,

Hans