[PATCH RESEND] Documentation: devicetree: Fix Xilinx VDMA specification
Andreas Färber
afaerber at suse.de
Wed Nov 12 10:03:32 PST 2014
Am 12.11.2014 um 16:57 schrieb Sören Brinkmann:
> On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 02:51PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> The specification requires xlnx,data-width, but example and driver use
>> xlnx,datawidth. Change the specification to match the implementation.
>
> Isn't this the wrong way around? The bindings are considered API, so
> shouldn't the driver be fixed to match the spec?
In theory, patch review should've never let the two differ... ;)
It's not my driver, so I fixed the perceived inconsistency the least
invasive way; Michal and Srikanth seemed to concur at the time.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4620261/
> Are there already dts files out there using either of these options?
In upstream, no. microblaze and virtex440 use a
xlnx,include-datawidth-matching-0 property as precedence for the
spelling, whereas there is an fsl,data-width and an unused msix-data-width.
Downstream, yes: Beyond my own patch derived from the Parallella tree,
there's some in the ADI tree. None in the Xilinx tree on quick check.
I haven't encountered any using the documented xlnx,data-width - but
this patch was authored pre 3.17, haven't ran a full Web search again.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 21284 AG Nürnberg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141112/d7c7c1f9/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list