[PATCH v4 2/5] dt-bindings: Add a clocks property to the simple-framebuffer binding
robherring2 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 12 09:43:56 PST 2014
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely at linaro.org> wrote:
> Rob, seeing as we disagree on patch #5, do you have time to discuss this
> evening, or tomorrow?
Yes, either is fine.
> On 12 Nov 2014 14:56, "Grant Likely" <grant.likely at linaro.org> wrote:
>> [Replying on-list and with original ccs]
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>> > Hi,
>> > On 11/11/2014 10:42 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> >> - clocks : List of clocks used by the framebuffer. Clocks listed here
>> >> are expected to already be configured correctly. The OS must
>> >> ensure these clocks are not modified or disabled while the
>> >> simple framebuffer remains active.
>> > Updated in my local tree, where I've also added proper commit messages
>> > to the 2 patches missing them. Shall I send a v5 of the set, and may I
>> > add your Acked-by to this patch when sending v5?
>> For this whole series, please add my Acked-by.
>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at linaro.org>
>> I'm okay with the bindings, and I'm okay with adding the clock
>> dependency to a simplefb node. I'm happy with the conversation we had
>> today on IRC, and I'm expecting to see a binding that covers expected
>> firmware/OS behaviour and association with the real hardware posted to
>> the list shortly.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel