[RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SYSCALL request
AKASHI Takahiro
takahiro.akashi at linaro.org
Wed Nov 12 02:46:01 PST 2014
Will,
On 11/07/2014 11:04 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/07, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
>> @@ -853,11 +853,6 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request,
>> datap);
>> break;
>>
>> - case PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL:
>> - task_thread_info(child)->syscall = data;
>> - ret = 0;
>> - break;
>> -
>> #ifdef CONFIG_CRUNCH
>> case PTRACE_GETCRUNCHREGS:
>> ret = ptrace_getcrunchregs(child, datap);
>> diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
>> index 54e7522..d7048fa 100644
>> --- a/kernel/ptrace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
>> @@ -1001,6 +1001,12 @@ int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, long request,
>> break;
>> }
>> #endif
>> +
>> +#ifdef PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL
>> + case PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL:
>> + ret = syscall_set_nr(child, task_pt_regs(child), data);
>> + break;
>> +#endif
>
> I too do not understand why it makes sense to move PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL into
> the common kernel/ptrace.c.
I think I explained why we need a new (atomic) interface of changing a system
call number while tracing with ptrace. But I don't have a strong preference,
either ptrace(SET_SYSCALL) or ptrace(SETREGSET, NT_SYSTEM_CALL).
> To me the fact that PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL can be undefined and syscall_set_nr()
> is very much arch-dependant (but most probably trivial) means that this code
> should live in arch_ptrace().
Thinking of Oleg's comment above, it doesn't make sense neither to define generic
NT_SYSTEM_CALL (user_regset) in uapi/linux/elf.h and implement it in ptrace_regset()
in kernel/ptrace.c with arch-defined syscall_(g)set_nr().
Since we should have the same interface on arm and arm64, we'd better implement
ptrace(PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL) locally on arm64 for now (as I originally submitted).
-Takahiro AKASHI
> In any case, I think it doesn't make sense to pass task_pt_regs(child), this
> helper can do this itself if it needs struct pt_regs.
>
> Oleg.
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list