[PATCH v2] PCI: designware: Add support 4 ATUs assignment
Srikanth Thokala
sriku.linux at gmail.com
Tue Nov 11 22:22:36 PST 2014
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Minghuan Lian
<Minghuan.Lian at freescale.com> wrote:
> Currently, pcie-designware.c only supports two ATUs, ATU0 is used
> for CFG0 and MEM, ATU1 is used for CFG1 and IO. There is a conflict
> when MEM and CFG0 are accessed simultaneously. The patch adds
> 'num-atus' property to PCIe dts node to describe the number of
> PCIe controller's ATUs. If num_atus is bigger than or equal to 4,
> we will change ATUs assignment: ATU0 for CFG0, ATU1 for CFG1,
> ATU2 for MEM, ATU3 for IO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian at freescale.com>
> ---
> change log:
> v1-v2:
> 1. add the default value to property num-atus description
> 2. Use atu_idx[] instead of single values
> 3. initialize num_atus to 2
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt | 1 +
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h | 9 ++++
> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
> index 9f4faa8..64d0533 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
> @@ -26,3 +26,4 @@ Optional properties:
> - bus-range: PCI bus numbers covered (it is recommended for new devicetrees to
> specify this property, to keep backwards compatibility a range of 0x00-0xff
> is assumed if not present)
> +- num-atus: number of ATUs. The default value is 2 if not present.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> index dfed00a..46a609d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
> #define PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT 0x900
> #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INBOUND (0x1 << 31)
> #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND (0x0 << 31)
> +#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX3 (0x3 << 0)
> +#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX2 (0x2 << 0)
> #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1 (0x1 << 0)
> #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0 (0x0 << 0)
> #define PCIE_ATU_CR1 0x904
> @@ -346,7 +348,7 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> struct of_pci_range range;
> struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
> struct resource *cfg_res;
> - u32 val, na, ns;
> + u32 num_atus = 2, val, na, ns;
I think this can be u8?
> const __be32 *addrp;
> int i, index, ret;
>
> @@ -486,6 +488,19 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> }
> }
>
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "num-atus", &num_atus);
and here too?
> + if (num_atus >= 4) {
> + pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_CFG0] = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0;
> + pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_CFG1] = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1;
> + pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_MEM] = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX2;
> + pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_IO] = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX3;
> + } else {
> + pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_CFG0] = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0;
> + pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_MEM] = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0;
> + pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_CFG1] = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1;
> + pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_IO] = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1;
> + }
> +
> if (pp->ops->host_init)
> pp->ops->host_init(pp);
>
> @@ -511,8 +526,9 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>
> static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
> {
> - /* Program viewport 0 : OUTBOUND : CFG0 */
> - dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0,
> + /* Program viewport : OUTBOUND : CFG0 */
> + dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp,
> + PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_CFG0],
> PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, pp->cfg0_mod_base, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, (pp->cfg0_mod_base >> 32), PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
> @@ -526,8 +542,9 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
>
> static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
> {
> - /* Program viewport 1 : OUTBOUND : CFG1 */
> - dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1,
> + /* Program viewport : OUTBOUND : CFG1 */
> + dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp,
> + PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_CFG1],
> PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1, PCIE_ATU_CR1);
> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, pp->cfg1_mod_base, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
> @@ -541,8 +558,9 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
>
> static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
> {
> - /* Program viewport 0 : OUTBOUND : MEM */
> - dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0,
> + /* Program viewport : OUTBOUND : MEM */
> + dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp,
> + PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_MEM],
> PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM, PCIE_ATU_CR1);
> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, pp->mem_mod_base, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
> @@ -557,8 +575,9 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
>
> static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
> {
> - /* Program viewport 1 : OUTBOUND : IO */
> - dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1,
> + /* Program viewport : OUTBOUND : IO */
> + dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp,
> + PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_IO],
> PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO, PCIE_ATU_CR1);
> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, pp->io_mod_base, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
> @@ -585,12 +604,14 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
> dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(pp, busdev);
> ret = dw_pcie_cfg_read(pp->va_cfg0_base + address, where, size,
> val);
> - dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
> + if (pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_MEM] == pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_CFG0])
> + dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
> } else {
> dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(pp, busdev);
> ret = dw_pcie_cfg_read(pp->va_cfg1_base + address, where, size,
> val);
> - dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
> + if (pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_IO] == pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_CFG1])
> + dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -610,12 +631,14 @@ static int dw_pcie_wr_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
> dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(pp, busdev);
> ret = dw_pcie_cfg_write(pp->va_cfg0_base + address, where, size,
> val);
> - dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
> + if (pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_MEM] == pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_CFG0])
> + dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
> } else {
> dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(pp, busdev);
> ret = dw_pcie_cfg_write(pp->va_cfg1_base + address, where, size,
> val);
> - dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
> + if (pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_IO] == pp->atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_CFG1])
> + dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -770,6 +793,10 @@ void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
> u32 membase;
> u32 memlimit;
>
> + /* set ATUs setting for MEM and IO */
> + dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
> + dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
> +
I see from the code, these settings are required for the calls other than
dw_pcie_(rd/wr)_other_conf, is it correct? If it is so, I feel this change is
independent of this patch and should go as a separte patch?
- Srikanth
> /* set the number of lanes */
> dw_pcie_readl_rc(pp, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, &val);
> val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> index c625675..37604f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,14 @@
> #define MAX_MSI_IRQS 32
> #define MAX_MSI_CTRLS (MAX_MSI_IRQS / 32)
>
> +enum ATU_TYPE {
> + ATU_TYPE_CFG0,
> + ATU_TYPE_CFG1,
> + ATU_TYPE_MEM,
> + ATU_TYPE_IO,
> + ATU_TYPE_MAX
> +};
> +
> struct pcie_port {
> struct device *dev;
> u8 root_bus_nr;
> @@ -53,6 +61,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
> struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> unsigned long msi_data;
> DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
> + u8 atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_MAX];
> };
>
> struct pcie_host_ops {
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list