[PATCH] ARM: dts: tegra: move serial aliases to per-board
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Tue Nov 11 15:39:54 PST 2014
On 11/11/2014 03:45 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> [again in plain text mode. Sigh]
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> On 11/11/2014 01:49 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> There are general changes pending to make the /aliases/serial* entries
>>> number the serial ports on the system. On tegra, so far the ports have
>>> just numbered dynamically as they are configured so that makes them
>>> To avoid this, add specific aliases per board to keep the old numbers.
>>> allows us to change the numbering by default on future SoCs while keeping
>>> numbering on existing boards.
>> This change seems mostly OK to me. FWIW though, I had suggested this
>> approach when the UART aliases were first added, and Laxman disagreed with
>> it. See commit b6551bb933f9 "ARM: tegra: dts: add aliases and DMA requestor
>> for serial controller", and its discussion:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/25/4. I've CC'd Laxman in case he still
>>> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net>
>>> Stephen/Thierry/Alex, as noticed this week we really should try to get
>>> this in before the 3.19 merge window so that the global aliases change
>>> can happen there without regression.
>> How did we resolve the issue that patch causes with old DTs; namely that it
>> causes a change in behaviour for those old DTs? On IRC, I'd wondered whether
>> we should set a flag so the kernel ignored aliases for boards containing
>> currently upstreamed Tegra SoCs so that issue wouldn't occur. If we did
>> that, we wouldn't need this patch.
> Another way could be to remove aliases from the kernel side during
> booting if they're found. Anyway, feel free to send a patch to do that
> if that's your preference.
That would work too.
I'll let Thierry make the call re: whether it's important to support old
DTs with the current aliase content without a change in device names
when booted on a newer kernel. If not, as I mentioned, I'm fine with
More information about the linux-arm-kernel