[PATCH] PM / Domains: Change prototype for the ->attach_dev() callback

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 08:43:29AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:38:30PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw at rjwysocki.net> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thursday, October 30, 2014 01:02:49 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> >> Convert the prototype to return and int. This is just an initial step,
> >> >> needed to support error handling.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman at linaro.org>
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> This patch is intended as fix for 3.18 rc[n]. Why?
> >> >>
> >> >> There are other SOC specific patches around that adds genpd support and which
> >> >> implements the ->attach_dev() callback. To prevent having an "atomic" patch
> >> >> during the next release cycle, let's change the prototype now instead.
> >> >>
> >> >> Further patches will add the actual error handling in genpd and these can then
> >> >> be reviewed and tested thoroughly.
> >> >
> >> > So we have no users of ->attach_dev at the moment, right?
> >>
> >> Not in mainline, but there are a couple getting ready to hit -next, so
> >> we wanted to fix this before they arrive so that adding the error
> >> handling will be easier.
> >
> > BTW, while we are at it, can we also pass the domain itself to
> > attach_dev() and detach_dev()? If anything it helps with debugging (you
> > can print domain name from the callbacks).
> 
> You can use dev->pm_domain, which is already set.
> 
> Note that this is no longer the case after Ulf's "[PATCH 3/4] PM / Domains:
> Improve error handling while adding/removing devices"!

Right, but I'd rather not poke in dev structure directly if I can help
it.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry