[PATCH] Exynos4: cpuidle: support dual CPUs with AFTR state

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 04/24/2014 07:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Please see my comments inline.
>
> Btw. Please fix your e-mail composer to properly wrap your messages
> around 7xth column, as otherwise they're hard to read.
>
> On 04.04.2014 11:48, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The following driver is for exynos4210. I did not yet finished the
>> other boards, so
>> I created a specific driver for 4210 which could be merged later.
>>
>> The driver is based on Colin Cross's driver found at:
>>
>> https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/exynos/+/e686b1ec67423c40b4fdf811f9a4dfa3b393a010%5E%5E!/
>>
>>
>> This one was based on a 3.4 kernel and an old API.
>>
>> It has been refreshed, simplified and based on the recent code cleanup
>> I sent
>> today.
>>
>> The AFTR could be entered when all the cpus (except cpu0) are down. In
>> order to
>> reach this situation, the couple idle states are used.
>>
>> There is a sync barrier at the entry and the exit of the low power
>> function. So
>> all cpus will enter and exit the function at the same time.
>>
>> At this point, CPU0 knows the other cpu will power down itself. CPU0
>> waits for
>> the CPU1 to be powered down and then initiate the AFTR power down
>> sequence.
>>
>> No interrupts are handled by CPU1, this is why we switch to the timer
>> broadcast
>> even if the local timer is not impacted by the idle state.
>>
>> When CPU0 wakes up, it powers up CPU1 and waits for it to boot. Then
>> they both
>> exit the idle function.
>>
>> This driver allows the exynos4210 to have the same power consumption
>> at idle
>> time than the one when we have to unplug CPU1 in order to let CPU0 to
>> reach
>> the AFTR state.
>>
>> This patch is a RFC because, we have to find a way to remove the macros
>> definitions and cpu powerdown function without pulling the arch dependent
>> headers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c        |   11 +-
>>   drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm          |    8 ++
>>   drivers/cpuidle/Makefile             |    1 +
>>   drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos4210.c |  226
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

[ ... ]


> Otherwise, I quite like the whole idea. I need to play a bit with CPU
> hotplug and PMU to verify that things couldn't really be simplified a
> bit, but in general this looks reasonably.

Hi Tomasz,

did you have time to look at this simplification ?

Thanks
   -- Daniel

-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog