[PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Tushar Behera]

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber at suse.de> wrote:
> Hi Tarek,
>
>
> And I reproducibly get failures for CPUs 1-3, resulting in only one CPU
> in /proc/cpuinfo (compared to 4 on downstream 3.14):
>
> [    0.045778] CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok
> [    0.045968] /cpus/cpu at 0 missing clock-frequency property
> [    0.045993] /cpus/cpu at 1 missing clock-frequency property
> [    0.046016] /cpus/cpu at 2 missing clock-frequency property
> [    0.046040] /cpus/cpu at 3 missing clock-frequency property
> [    0.046059] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
> [    0.046135] Setting up static identity map for 0x403a8920 - 0x403a8978
> [    2.075052] CPU1: failed to come online
> [    4.085095] CPU2: failed to come online
> [    6.095142] CPU3: failed to come online
> [    6.095237] Brought up 1 CPUs
> [    6.095269] SMP: Total of 1 processors activated.
> [    6.095303] CPU: All CPU(s) started in HYP mode.
> [    6.095336] CPU: Virtualization extensions available.
>
> I also notice another apparent device tree issue:
>
> [    7.341814] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
> node '/soc/mmc at 12220000/slot at 0[0]'
> [    7.341850] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
> node '/soc/mmc at 12220000/slot at 0[0]'
>
> Are any of those known issues and being worked on?
> (The CPU failures affected 5420 Arndale Octa as well iirc.)
>

Can you check after applying following two patches for Arndale-Octa
([1],[2])? In other words, a patch similar to [2] might be required
for this board too if it is booting under secure mode.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31776.html

[PATCH v2 Resend 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Update secondary boot addr for secure mode

[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31777.html

[PATCH v2 Resend 2/2] ARM: dts: Add secure firmware support for Arndale-octa


--
Tushar Behera