[PATCH] arm64: kernel: initialize broadcast hrtimer based clock event device

[Preeti U Murthy]

Hi Lorenzo,

On 05/29/2014 02:53 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On platforms implementing CPU power management, the CPUidle subsystem
> can allow CPUs to enter idle states where local timers logic is lost on power
> down. To keep the software timers functional the kernel relies on an
> always-on broadcast timer to be present in the platform to relay the
> interrupt signalling the timer expiries.
> 
> For platforms implementing CPU core gating that do not implement an always-on
> HW timer or implement it in a broken way, this patch adds code to initialize
> the kernel software broadcast hrtimer upon boot. It relies on a dynamically

It would be best to use the term "hrtimer based broadcast device"
throughout the changelog for uniformity and to avoid confusion instead
of mixing it with "software broadcast".

> chosen CPU to be always powered-up. This CPU then relays the timer interrupt
> to CPUs in deep-idle states through its HW local timer device.
> 
> On systems with power management capabilities but no functional HW broadcast
> tick device, the hrtimer based clock event device allows the kernel to
> enter high-resolution timer mode, which improves system latencies and saves
> dynamic power.

Sorry but I do not understand the above paragraph. What do you mean by
"allows the kernel to enter high resolution timer mode" ? And how does
it improve system latency? I understand that the hrtimer based
clockevent device saves dynamic power since it provides a mechanism in
which cpus can enter deeper idle states.

> 
> The side effect of having a CPU always-on has implications on power management
> platform capabilities and makes CPUidle suboptimal, since at least a CPU is
> kept always in a shallow idle state by the kernel to relay timer interrupts,
> but at least leaves the kernel with a functional system with some working power
> management capabilities.
> 
> The hrtimer based clock event device has lowest possible rating so that,
> if a platform contains a functional HW clock event device with broadcast
> capabilities, that device is always chosen as a tick broadcast device instead
> of the software based one, now present by default.

I think this statement "instead of the software based one, now present
by default" is incorrect. The hrtimer based clock event device will come
into picture only when the arch calls tick_setup_hrtimer_broadcast()
explicitly. Otherwise either the arch should register a real clock
device which does broadcast or should disable deep idle states where the
local timers stop. So I would suggest skipping the last paragraph as it
is not conveying anything in specific. The fact that a clock device with
the highest rating will be chosen is already known and need not be
mentioned explicitly IMHO.

> 
> Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
> index 29c39d5..3d43900 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>   * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/clockchips.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> @@ -67,6 +68,8 @@ void __init time_init(void)
>  
>  	clocksource_of_init();
>  
> +	tick_setup_hrtimer_broadcast();
> +
>  	arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_get_rate();
>  	if (!arch_timer_rate)
>  		panic("Unable to initialise architected timer.\n");
> 

You have defined flag "CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP" for your deep idle
states in which timer stops right?

Regards
Preeti U Murthy