[PATCH] misc: atmel_pwm: only build for supported platforms
pebolle at tiscali.nl
Wed May 28 10:59:08 PDT 2014
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 19:55 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 28/05/2014 at 18:09:43 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote :
> > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 17:59 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > On 28/05/2014 at 14:24:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote :
> > > > > > config ATMEL_PWM
> > > > > > tristate "Atmel AT32/AT91 PWM support"
> > > > > > - depends on HAVE_CLK && (AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)
> > > > > > + depends on HAVE_CLK
> > > > > > + depends on AVR32 || AT91SAM9263 || AT91SAM9RL || AT91SAM9G45
> > > >
> > > > Symbols AT91SAM9263, AT91SAM9RL, and AT91SAM9G45 do not seem to exist in
> > > > next-20140528. Should these perhaps be SOC_AT91SAM9263, SOC_AT91SAM9RL,
> > > > and SOC_AT91SAM9G45 and/or ARCH_AT91SAM9263, ARCH_AT91SAM9RL, and
> > > > ARCH_AT91SAM9G45?
> > >
> > > I wouldn't bother too much fixing that, this will definitely be remove
> > > in 3.17.
> > Are you talking about: 1) the problem this patch tried to fix; or 2) the
> > problem it created?
> I'm removing the whole atmel_pwm driver so the CONFIG_ATMEL_PWM symbol
> will be gone.
So the patch we're discussing here will never be included in a release?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel