[PATCH] pwm: i.MX: Cleanup indentation for register definitions

[Liu Ying]

On 05/28/2014 05:56 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Liu Ying wrote:
>> This patch contains no logic change to cleanup indentation
>> for register definitions only.
>>
>> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
>> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at freescale.com>
>> Cc: Lothar Waßmann <LW at KARO-electronics.de>
>> Cc: linux-pwm at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <Ying.Liu at freescale.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c |   26 +++++++++++++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
>> index cc47733..0784554 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
>> @@ -21,24 +21,24 @@
>>  
>>  /* i.MX1 and i.MX21 share the same PWM function block: */
>>  
>> -#define MX1_PWMC    0x00   /* PWM Control Register */
>> -#define MX1_PWMS    0x04   /* PWM Sample Register */
>> -#define MX1_PWMP    0x08   /* PWM Period Register */
>> +#define MX1_PWMC			0x00   /* PWM Control Register */
>> +#define MX1_PWMS			0x04   /* PWM Sample Register */
>> +#define MX1_PWMP			0x08   /* PWM Period Register */
>>  
>> -#define MX1_PWMC_EN		(1 << 4)
>> +#define MX1_PWMC_EN			(1 << 4)
>>  
>>  /* i.MX27, i.MX31, i.MX35 share the same PWM function block: */
>>  
>> -#define MX3_PWMCR                 0x00    /* PWM Control Register */
>> -#define MX3_PWMSAR                0x0C    /* PWM Sample Register */
>> -#define MX3_PWMPR                 0x10    /* PWM Period Register */
>> -#define MX3_PWMCR_PRESCALER(x)    (((x - 1) & 0xFFF) << 4)
>> -#define MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN                (1 << 24)
>> -#define MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN                (1 << 23)
>> +#define MX3_PWMCR			0x00    /* PWM Control Register */
>> +#define MX3_PWMSAR			0x0C    /* PWM Sample Register */
>> +#define MX3_PWMPR			0x10    /* PWM Period Register */
>> +#define MX3_PWMCR_PRESCALER(x)		(((x - 1) & 0xFFF) << 4)
>                                                    ^
> You could also add the missing () around the macro argument when you
> are changing this line anyway.
> 

I may generate a separate patch to do that.

Thanks.

> 
> Lothar Waßmann
> 

-- 
Liu Ying