[PATCH v3 07/14] ARM: KVM: one_reg coproc set and get BE fixes
Victor Kamensky
victor.kamensky at linaro.org
Tue May 27 23:23:34 PDT 2014
On 27 May 2014 11:22, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com> wrote:
> On 13/05/14 17:13, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>> Fix code that handles KVM_SET_ONE_REG, KVM_GET_ONE_REG ioctls to work in BE
>> image. Before this fix get/set_one_reg functions worked correctly only in
>> LE case - reg_from_user was taking 'void *' kernel address that actually could
>> be target/source memory of either 4 bytes size or 8 bytes size, and code copied
>> from/to user memory that could hold either 4 bytes register, 8 byte register
>> or pair of 4 bytes registers.
>>
>> For example note that there was a case when 4 bytes register was read from
>> user-land to kernel target address of 8 bytes value. Because it was working
>> in LE, least significant word was memcpy(ied) and it just worked. In BE code
>> with 'void *' as target/source 'val' type it is impossible to tell whether
>> 4 bytes register from user-land should be copied to 'val' address itself
>> (4 bytes target) or it should be copied to 'val' + 4 (least significant word
>> of 8 bytes value). So first change was to introduce strongly typed
>> functions, where type of target/source 'val' is strongly defined:
>>
>> reg_from_user_to_u64 - reads register from user-land to kernel 'u64 *val'
>> address; register size could be 4 or 8 bytes
>> reg_from_user_to_u32 - reads register(s) from user-land to kernel 'u32 *val'
>> address; note it could be one or two 4 bytes registers
>> reg_to_user_from_u64 - writes register from kernel 'u64 *val' address to
>> user-land register memory; register size could be
>> 4 or 8 bytes
>> ret_to_user_from_u32 - writes register(s) from kernel 'u32 *val' address to
>> user-land register(s) memory; note it could be
>> one or two 4 bytes registers
>>
>> All places where reg_from_user, reg_to_user functions were used, were changed
>> to use either corresponding u64 or u32 variants of functions depending on
>> type of source/target kernel memory variable.
>>
>> In case of 'u64 *val' and register size equals 4 bytes, reg_from_user_to_u64
>> and reg_to_user_from_u64 work only with least siginificant word of
>> target/source kernel value. It would be nice to deal only with u32 kernel
>> values in _u32 functions and with u64 kernel values in _u64 functions,
>> however it is not always possible because functions like set_invariant_cp15
>> get_invariant_cp15 store values in u64 types but registers are 32bit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
>> index c58a351..5ca6582 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
>> @@ -682,17 +682,83 @@ static struct coproc_reg invariant_cp15[] = {
>> { CRn( 0), CRm( 0), Op1( 1), Op2( 7), is32, NULL, get_AIDR },
>> };
>>
>> -static int reg_from_user(void *val, const void __user *uaddr, u64 id)
>> +/*
>> + * Reads register value from user-land uaddr address into kernel u64 value
>> + * given by val address. Note register size could be 4 bytes, so user-land
>> + * 4 bytes value will be copied into least significant word. Or register
>> + * size could be 8 bytes, so function works as regular copy.
>> + */
>> +static int reg_from_user_to_u64(u64 *val, const void __user *uaddr, u64 id)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long regsize = KVM_REG_SIZE(id);
>> + union {
>> + u32 word;
>> + u64 dword;
>> + } tmp = {0};
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(&tmp, uaddr, regsize) != 0)
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + switch (regsize) {
>> + case 4:
>> + *val = tmp.word;
>> + break;
>> + case 8:
>> + *val = tmp.dword;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Reads register value from user-land uaddr address to kernel u32 value
>> + * or array of two u32 values. I.e. it may really copy two u32 registers
>> + * when used with register which size is 8 bytes (for example V7 64
>> + * bit registers like TTBR0/TTBR1).
>> + */
>> +static int reg_from_user_to_u32(u32 *val, const void __user *uaddr, u64 id)
>> {
>> - /* This Just Works because we are little endian. */
>> if (copy_from_user(val, uaddr, KVM_REG_SIZE(id)) != 0)
>> return -EFAULT;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int reg_to_user(void __user *uaddr, const void *val, u64 id)
>> +/*
>> + * Writes register value to user-land uaddr address from kernel u64 value
>> + * given by val address. Note register size could be 4 bytes, so only 4
>> + * bytes from least significant word will by copied into uaddr address.
>> + * In case of 8 bytes sized register it works as regular copy.
>> + */
>> +static int reg_to_user_from_u64(void __user *uaddr, const u64 *val, u64 id)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long regsize = KVM_REG_SIZE(id);
>> + union {
>> + u32 word;
>> + u64 dword;
>> + } tmp;
>> +
>> + switch (regsize) {
>> + case 4:
>> + tmp.word = *val;
>> + break;
>> + case 8:
>> + tmp.dword = *val;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (copy_to_user(uaddr, &tmp, regsize) != 0)
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Writes register value to user-land uaddr address from kernel u32 value
>> + * or arra of two u32 values. I.e it may really copy two u32 registers
>> + * when used with register which size is 8 bytes (for example V7 64
>> + * bit registers like TTBR0/TTBR1).
>> + */
>> +static int reg_to_user_from_u32(void __user *uaddr, const u32 *val, u64 id)
>> {
>> - /* This Just Works because we are little endian. */
>> if (copy_to_user(uaddr, val, KVM_REG_SIZE(id)) != 0)
>> return -EFAULT;
>> return 0;
>> @@ -710,7 +776,7 @@ static int get_invariant_cp15(u64 id, void __user *uaddr)
>> if (!r)
>> return -ENOENT;
>>
>> - return reg_to_user(uaddr, &r->val, id);
>> + return reg_to_user_from_u64(uaddr, &r->val, id);
>> }
>>
>> static int set_invariant_cp15(u64 id, void __user *uaddr)
>> @@ -726,7 +792,7 @@ static int set_invariant_cp15(u64 id, void __user *uaddr)
>> if (!r)
>> return -ENOENT;
>>
>> - err = reg_from_user(&val, uaddr, id);
>> + err = reg_from_user_to_u64(&val, uaddr, id);
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>>
>> @@ -894,8 +960,8 @@ static int vfp_get_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id, void __user *uaddr)
>> if (vfpid < num_fp_regs()) {
>> if (KVM_REG_SIZE(id) != 8)
>> return -ENOENT;
>> - return reg_to_user(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpregs[vfpid],
>> - id);
>> + return reg_to_user_from_u64(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpregs[vfpid],
>> + id);
>> }
>>
>> /* FP control registers are all 32 bit. */
>> @@ -904,22 +970,22 @@ static int vfp_get_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id, void __user *uaddr)
>>
>> switch (vfpid) {
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_FPEXC:
>> - return reg_to_user(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpexc, id);
>> + return reg_to_user_from_u32(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpexc, id);
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_FPSCR:
>> - return reg_to_user(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpscr, id);
>> + return reg_to_user_from_u32(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpscr, id);
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_FPINST:
>> - return reg_to_user(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpinst, id);
>> + return reg_to_user_from_u32(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpinst, id);
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_FPINST2:
>> - return reg_to_user(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpinst2, id);
>> + return reg_to_user_from_u32(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpinst2, id);
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_MVFR0:
>> val = fmrx(MVFR0);
>> - return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
>> + return reg_to_user_from_u32(uaddr, &val, id);
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_MVFR1:
>> val = fmrx(MVFR1);
>> - return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
>> + return reg_to_user_from_u32(uaddr, &val, id);
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_FPSID:
>> val = fmrx(FPSID);
>> - return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
>> + return reg_to_user_from_u32(uaddr, &val, id);
>> default:
>> return -ENOENT;
>> }
>> @@ -938,8 +1004,8 @@ static int vfp_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id, const void __user *uaddr)
>> if (vfpid < num_fp_regs()) {
>> if (KVM_REG_SIZE(id) != 8)
>> return -ENOENT;
>> - return reg_from_user(&vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpregs[vfpid],
>> - uaddr, id);
>> + return reg_from_user_to_u64(&vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpregs[vfpid],
>> + uaddr, id);
>> }
>>
>> /* FP control registers are all 32 bit. */
>> @@ -948,28 +1014,28 @@ static int vfp_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id, const void __user *uaddr)
>>
>> switch (vfpid) {
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_FPEXC:
>> - return reg_from_user(&vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpexc, uaddr, id);
>> + return reg_from_user_to_u32(&vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpexc, uaddr, id);
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_FPSCR:
>> - return reg_from_user(&vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpscr, uaddr, id);
>> + return reg_from_user_to_u32(&vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpscr, uaddr, id);
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_FPINST:
>> - return reg_from_user(&vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpinst, uaddr, id);
>> + return reg_from_user_to_u32(&vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpinst, uaddr, id);
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_FPINST2:
>> - return reg_from_user(&vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpinst2, uaddr, id);
>> + return reg_from_user_to_u32(&vcpu->arch.vfp_guest.fpinst2, uaddr, id);
>> /* These are invariant. */
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_MVFR0:
>> - if (reg_from_user(&val, uaddr, id))
>> + if (reg_from_user_to_u32(&val, uaddr, id))
>> return -EFAULT;
>> if (val != fmrx(MVFR0))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> return 0;
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_MVFR1:
>> - if (reg_from_user(&val, uaddr, id))
>> + if (reg_from_user_to_u32(&val, uaddr, id))
>> return -EFAULT;
>> if (val != fmrx(MVFR1))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> return 0;
>> case KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_FPSID:
>> - if (reg_from_user(&val, uaddr, id))
>> + if (reg_from_user_to_u32(&val, uaddr, id))
>> return -EFAULT;
>> if (val != fmrx(FPSID))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -1016,7 +1082,7 @@ int kvm_arm_coproc_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>> return get_invariant_cp15(reg->id, uaddr);
>>
>> /* Note: copies two regs if size is 64 bit. */
>> - return reg_to_user(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.cp15[r->reg], reg->id);
>> + return reg_to_user_from_u32(uaddr, &vcpu->arch.cp15[r->reg], reg->id);
>> }
>>
>> int kvm_arm_coproc_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>> @@ -1035,7 +1101,7 @@ int kvm_arm_coproc_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>> return set_invariant_cp15(reg->id, uaddr);
>>
>> /* Note: copies two regs if size is 64 bit */
>> - return reg_from_user(&vcpu->arch.cp15[r->reg], uaddr, reg->id);
>> + return reg_from_user_to_u32(&vcpu->arch.cp15[r->reg], uaddr, reg->id);
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned int num_demux_regs(void)
>>
>
> I really dislike this patch because of the asymmetric behaviour. Why
> can't we always use the "_u64" version?
Kernel target type could be u32. It code passes it as pointer
to u64 it will do wrong things.
I've sent the most recent version of BE coproc handling patches
as RFC, let's discuss it there. I think I addressed your
questions/concerns in cover letter.
Thanks,
Victor
>
> Actually, why don't we use a construct similar to what we have for
> mmio_{read,write}_buf? This would give us a unified access method.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list