[PATCH v11 2/3] clk: exynos5410: register clocks using common clock framework
Tarek Dakhran
t.dakhran at gmail.com
Tue May 27 19:20:06 PDT 2014
Hi Mike,
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Tarek Dakhran (2014-05-25 20:23:32)
>> The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered
>> using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran at samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov at samsung.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt | 45 +++++
>> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c | 209 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h | 33 ++++
>> 4 files changed, 288 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..aeab635
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>> +* Samsung Exynos5410 Clock Controller
>> +
>> +The Exynos5410 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various
>> +controllers within the Exynos5410 SoC.
>> +
>> +Required Properties:
>> +
>> +- compatible: should be "samsung,exynos5410-clock"
>> +
>> +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
>> + region.
>> +
>> +- #clock-cells: should be 1.
>> +
>> +All available clocks are defined as preprocessor macros in
>> +dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h header and can be used in device
>> +tree sources.
>> +
>> +External clock:
>> +
>> +There is clock that is generated outside the SoC. It
>> +is expected that it is defined using standard clock bindings
>> +with following clock-output-name:
>> +
>> + - "fin_pll" - PLL input clock from XXTI
>
> Does fin_pll feed into the exynos5410-clock controller? If so, should
> the example clock-controller node below have a clocks and clock-names
> property?
fin_pll does not feed into exynos5410-clock controller, but into mct do.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3839c26
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
> +/*
> + * SAMSUNG EXYNOS5410 SoC device tree source
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + * http://www.samsung.com
> + *
> + * SAMSUNG EXYNOS5410 SoC device nodes are listed in this file.
> + * EXYNOS5410 based board files can include this file and provide
> + * values for board specfic bindings.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include "skeleton.dtsi"
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h>
> +
> +/ {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5410", "samsung,exynos5";
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
[snip]
> + mct: mct at 101C0000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-mct";
> + reg = <0x101C0000 0xB00>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&interrupt_map>;
> + interrupts = <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>,
> + <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>,
> + <8>, <9>, <10>, <11>;
> + clocks = <&fin_pll>, <&clock CLK_MCT>;
> + clock-names = "fin_pll", "mct";
> +
> + interrupt_map: interrupt-map {
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + #address-cells = <0>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + interrupt-map = <0 &combiner 23 3>,
> + <1 &combiner 23 4>,
> + <2 &combiner 25 2>,
> + <3 &combiner 25 3>,
> + <4 &gic 0 120 0>,
> + <5 &gic 0 121 0>,
> + <6 &gic 0 122 0>,
> + <7 &gic 0 123 0>,
> + <8 &gic 0 128 0>,
> + <9 &gic 0 129 0>,
> + <10 &gic 0 130 0>,
> + <11 &gic 0 131 0>;
> + };
> + };
> +
That's why I documented fin_pll. Should I add mct binding example to
documentation too?
Best regards,
Tarek
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list