[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] mfd: AXP20x: Add support for AXP202 and AXP209
Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com
Thu May 22 12:55:23 PDT 2014
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:15:12PM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
> >> >> This set of patches introduces the core driver and support for two different
> >> >> subsystems:
> >> >> - Regulators
> >> >
> >> >> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-input-axp-pek | 11 +
> >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 93 +++++++
> >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
> >> >> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 3 +
> >> >> arch/arm/configs/sunxi_defconfig | 4 +
> >> >> drivers/input/misc/Kconfig | 11 +
> >> >> drivers/input/misc/Makefile | 1 +
> >> >> drivers/input/misc/axp20x-pek.c | 281 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 12 +
> >> >> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> >> >> drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 258 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 180 +++++++++++++
> >> >> 12 files changed, 856 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > The regulator changes don't appear to be showing up in the diffstat or
> >> > obviously in the series?
> >>
> >> Right. Cut-and-paste error.
> >> You have already applied the regulator patches so I didn't include
> >> them here (in theory I posted this series to be picked up by Lee).
> >
> > That's fine. Just tell me which patches need to stay together and
> > which are able to be applied through their respective subsystem trees
> > separately. Then, once I have all the Acks I can apply no problem.
>
> Hi Lee,
> I'd say #1 for the MFD tree, #4 for the input subsystem, #2 #3 and #5
> are documentations, #6 and #7 defconfigs add-on.
I am fine with the input piece going through MFD tree, no need to split
it from the rest.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list