[PATCH v1 5/5] pci: keystone: add pcie driver based on designware core driver

[Murali Karicheri]

On 5/19/2014 8:06 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 May 2014 16:26:51 Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> On 5/15/2014 2:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:45:08 Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_KEYSTONE
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * The KeyStone PCIe controller has maximum read request size of 256 bytes.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +static void quirk_limit_readrequest(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +    int readrq = pcie_get_readrq(dev);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    if (readrq > 256)
>>>>>> +            pcie_set_readrq(dev, 256);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_limit_readrequest);
>>>>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_KEYSTONE */
>>>>> This doesn't work: you can't just limit do this for all devices just based
>>>>> on PCI_KEYSTONE being enabled, you have to check if you are actually using
>>>>> this controller.
>>>>>
>>>>>         Arnd
>>>>     I assume, I need to check if PCI controller's vendor ID/ device ID
>>>> match with the keystone
>>>>     PCI controller's ID and call pcie_set_readrq() for all of the slave
>>>> PCI devices and do this fixup.
>>>> Is this correct understanding?  If you can point me to an example code
>>>> for this that will be
>>>> really helpful so that I can avoid re-inventing the wheel.
>>> I think it would be best to move the quirk into the keystone pci driver
>>> and compare compare the dev->driver pointer of the PCI controller device.
>>>
>>>        Arnd
>> Arnd,
>>
>> I will move this quirk to keystone pci driver. So in that case, I guess
>> your original comment
>> is not applicable as  this quirk gets enabled only with PCI keystone
>> driver enabled. Right?
> Of course you still have to fix the bug, not just move the code into
> the driver. Otherwise it's still broken for every machine after the keystone
> driver is enabled.

Agree. I have tried following to get this work so that the quirk gets 
applied only for
keystone pci controller.

#define KS_K2HK_PCI_DEVICE_ID    0xb008
#define KS_K2E_PCI_DEVICE_ID    0xb009
#define KS_K2L_PCI_DEVICE_ID    0xb00a

static u16 root_pci_ids[] =
     {KS_K2HK_PCI_DEVICE_ID, KS_K2E_PCI_DEVICE_ID, KS_K2L_PCI_DEVICE_ID, 
0 };
/*
  * The KeyStone PCIe controller has maximum read request size of 256 bytes.
  */
static void quirk_limit_readrequest(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
     struct pci_dev *root_dev;
     int i = 0;

     /* Apply quirk only if this bridge device is keystone */
     while (root_pci_ids[i]) {
         root_dev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, root_pci_ids[i], NULL);
         if ((root_dev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI) {
             int readrq;

             readrq = pcie_get_readrq(dev);
             if (pcie_get_readrq(dev) > 256) {
                 pcie_set_readrq(dev, 256);
                 printk("Applied quirk\n");
             }
             break;
         };
     }
}
DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_limit_readrequest);

>
> I also agree with Jason that changing the PCI core to call
> pcie_bus_configure_settings() would be a better way of dealing with this
> if it solves the problem.

I tried following piece of code added to bios32.c

void pci_common_init_dev(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw)
{
         struct pci_sys_data *sys;
         LIST_HEAD(head);

         pci_add_flags(PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_RSRC);
         if (hw->preinit)
                 hw->preinit();

          ........
          ....

          list_for_each_entry(sys, &head, node) {
                 struct pci_bus *bus = sys->bus;

                 if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
                         /*
                          * Size the bridge windows.
                          */
                         pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);

                         /*
                          * Assign resources.
                          */
                         pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
                 }
                 /*
                  * Tell drivers about devices found.
                  */
                 pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
         }

// New code starts here
         list_for_each_entry(sys, &head, node) {
                 struct pci_bus *bus = sys->bus;

                 /* Configure PCI Express settings */
                 if (bus && !pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
                         struct pci_bus *child;

                         list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
                         pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
                 }
         }
// New code ends.

This seems to do different things based on the pci bootargs. The key 
requirement for Keystone PCI controller
is that the MRRS can't be more than 256 bytes.  The only option that 
works for keystone PCI controller
is with pci=pcie_bus_perf.   I see following logs:-

[    3.382747] pcie_bus_configure_settings, config 2
[    3.382753] pcie_bus_configure_set
[    3.382781] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: Max Payload Size set to  256/ 256 
(was  128), Max Read Rq  256
[    3.382788] pcie_bus_configure_set
[    3.382846] pci 0000:01:00.0: Max Payload Size set to  256/ 256 (was  
128), Max Read Rq  256
[    3.382852] pcie_bus_configure_set
[    3.382909] pci 0000:01:00.1: Max Payload Size set to  256/ 256 (was  
128), Max Read Rq  256

On ARM, by default pci_bus_config seems to be set to 0 
(PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF). So the code doesn't get
executed for this default. But for PCIE_BUS_SAFE, it doesn't change the 
mrrs at the EP and is not
good for our platform w.r.t mrrs settings. For PCIE_BUS_PERFORMANCE, it 
seems to increase the payload
size as well and Keystone Payload size is limited to 128 bytes. So it is 
not safe to increase the payload
size to 256 based on the log.

On other platforms, Why the PCI core try to set the payload size equal 
to mrrs? Is this explained in any
PCI spec?  Looks like this is done for performance? Let me know if you 
want me to send a patch for
review to add the pcie_bus_configure_settings() code to 
arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c

For the Keystone PCI driver, I believe. it is safe to have the quirk so 
that controller can handle the
read requests properly. Let me know if the quirk code above looks good 
to go.

Murali

> 	Arnd