[PATCH 1/1] arm: dma-iommu: Clean up redundant variable
Ritesh Harjani
ritesh.harjani at gmail.com
Mon May 19 08:07:59 PDT 2014
++ mailing lists
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:34 PM, <ritesh.harjani at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.harjani at gmail.com>
>
> mapping->size can be derived from mapping->bits << PAGE_SHIFT
> which makes mapping->size as redundant.
>
> Clean this up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.harjani at gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h | 1 -
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h
> index eec0a12..8e3fcb9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ struct dma_iommu_mapping {
> unsigned int extensions;
> size_t bitmap_size; /* size of a single bitmap */
> size_t bits; /* per bitmap */
> - unsigned int size; /* per bitmap */
> dma_addr_t base;
>
> spinlock_t lock;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 6b00be1..ec3373c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -1074,6 +1074,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t __alloc_iova(struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping,
> unsigned int order = get_order(size);
> unsigned int align = 0;
> unsigned int count, start;
> + unsigned int mapping_size = mapping->bits << PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned long flags;
> dma_addr_t iova;
> int i;
> @@ -1119,7 +1120,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t __alloc_iova(struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping,
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->lock, flags);
>
> - iova = mapping->base + (mapping->size * i);
> + iova = mapping->base + (mapping_size * i);
> iova += start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> return iova;
> @@ -1129,6 +1130,7 @@ static inline void __free_iova(struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping,
> dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
> {
> unsigned int start, count;
> + unsigned int mapping_size = mapping->bits << PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned long flags;
> dma_addr_t bitmap_base;
> u32 bitmap_index;
> @@ -1136,14 +1138,14 @@ static inline void __free_iova(struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping,
> if (!size)
> return;
>
> - bitmap_index = (u32) (addr - mapping->base) / (u32) mapping->size;
> + bitmap_index = (u32) (addr - mapping->base) / (u32) mapping_size;
> BUG_ON(addr < mapping->base || bitmap_index > mapping->extensions);
>
> - bitmap_base = mapping->base + mapping->size * bitmap_index;
> + bitmap_base = mapping->base + mapping_size * bitmap_index;
>
> start = (addr - bitmap_base) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - if (addr + size > bitmap_base + mapping->size) {
> + if (addr + size > bitmap_base + mapping_size) {
> /*
> * The address range to be freed reaches into the iova
> * range of the next bitmap. This should not happen as
> @@ -1964,7 +1966,6 @@ arm_iommu_create_mapping(struct bus_type *bus, dma_addr_t base, size_t size)
> mapping->extensions = extensions;
> mapping->base = base;
> mapping->bits = BITS_PER_BYTE * bitmap_size;
> - mapping->size = mapping->bits << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> spin_lock_init(&mapping->lock);
>
> --
> 1.8.1.3
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list