[PATCH 4/4] phy: miphy365x: Provide support for the MiPHY356x Generic PHY
Kishon Vijay Abraham I
kishon at ti.com
Mon May 19 07:21:08 PDT 2014
Hi,
On Wednesday 05 March 2014 01:25 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:23:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>> The MiPHY365x is a Generic PHY which can serve various SATA or PCIe
>> devices. It has 2 ports which it can use for either; both SATA, both
>> PCIe or one of each in any configuration.
>>
>> Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 10 +
>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c | 614 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 625 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
>
> [...]
>
>> +enum miphy_sata_gen {
>> + SATA_GEN1 = 1,
>> + SATA_GEN2,
>> + SATA_GEN3
>> +};
>
> It would be nice to have a comment here that these values are ABI and
> cannot change.
>
> [...]
>
>> +static struct phy *miphy365x_phy_xlate(struct device *dev,
>> + struct of_phandle_args *args)
>> +{
>> + struct miphy365x_dev *state = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + u8 port = args->args[0];
>> + u8 type = args->args[1];
>
> In case of a bad dt, it would be nice to check args->arg_count == 2.
>
> ALso, we throw away the top 24 bits, which may have been set
> erroneously. If we want to make use of those in future we should test
> they are clear here to force people to do the right thing.
I don't seem to have the update patch series? Can you resend please?
Thanks
Kishon
>
> Otherwise, this looks fine to me.
>
> With those additions:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
>
> Cheers,
> Mark.
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list