[PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error

[Kukjin Kim]

On 05/16/14 20:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 May 2014 15:48, Jonghwan Choi<jhbird.choi at samsung.com>  wrote:
>> Commit 7da83a80 ("ARM: EXYNOS: Migrate Exynos specific macros from plat to mach") which lands in samsung tree causes build breakage
>> for cpufreq-exynos like following:
>>
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c: In function 'exynos_cpufreq_probe':
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:166:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'soc_is_exynos4210'
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:168:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'soc_is_exynos4212'
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:168:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'soc_is_exynos4412'
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:170:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'soc_is_exynos5250'
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>> make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.o] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c: In function 'exynos4x12_set_clkdiv':
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c:118:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'soc_is_exynos4212'
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>> make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.o] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [drivers/cpufreq] Error 2
>
> Blank line here..
>
>> This fixes above error with getting SoC information via of_machine_is_compatible() instead of soc_is_exynosXXXX().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi<jhbird.choi at samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c     |   20 +++++++++++++++++---
>>   drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h     |    8 ++++++++
>>   drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c |   11 ++++-------
>>   3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
>> index f99cfe2..9aecffef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>   #include<linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>   #include<linux/cpufreq.h>
>>   #include<linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include<linux/of.h>
>>
>>   #include<plat/cpu.h>
>>
>> @@ -163,11 +164,24 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>          if (!exynos_info)
>>                  return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> -       if (soc_is_exynos4210())
>> +       if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210")) {
>> +               exynos_info->type = EXYNOS_SOC_4210;
>> +       } else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4212")) {
>> +               exynos_info->type = EXYNOS_SOC_4212;
>> +       } else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4412")) {
>> +               exynos_info->type = EXYNOS_SOC_4212;
>
> 4412 ?
>
Yes, I will fix when I apply.

>> +       } else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250")) {
>> +               exynos_info->type = EXYNOS_SOC_5250;
>> +       } else {
>> +               pr_err("%s: Unknown SoC type\n", __func__);
>> +               return -ENODEV;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if (exynos_info->type == EXYNOS_SOC_4210)
>>                  ret = exynos4210_cpufreq_init(exynos_info);
>> -       else if (soc_is_exynos4212() || soc_is_exynos4412())
>> +       else if (exynos_info->type == EXYNOS_SOC_4212 || exynos_info->type == EXYNOS_SOC_4412)
>>                  ret = exynos4x12_cpufreq_init(exynos_info);
>> -       else if (soc_is_exynos5250())
>> +       else if (exynos_info->type == EXYNOS_SOC_5250)
>>                  ret = exynos5250_cpufreq_init(exynos_info);
>>          else
>>                  return 0;
>
> Do this in the first if/else only..

Probably, you mean following in above?

 >> -       if (soc_is_exynos4210())

I've applied this with fixing typo you mentioned just now, if any 
concerns, please kindly let me know.

Thanks,
Kukjin