[RFC PATCH 4/5] thermal: cpu_cooling: Release the upper cooling limit checks
Eduardo Valentin
edubezval at gmail.com
Thu May 15 11:58:14 PDT 2014
Hello Amit,
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:07:59PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This is required as with addition of cpufreq cooling notifiers
> mechanism the client can enable some more cooling states at a later
> point of time. Say when minimum p state is reached then ACPI specific
> throttling is enabled which may add some more cooling states.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel at samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 2 +-
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 9 +++------
> include/linux/thermal.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> index f251521..7d65617 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
> }
> break;
> case THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL:
> - if (throttle)
> + if (instance->upper != THERMAL_CSTATE_MAX && throttle)
> next_target = instance->upper;
> break;
> case THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING:
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index 71b0ec0..36bb107 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -921,7 +921,6 @@ int thermal_zone_bind_cooling_device(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> struct thermal_instance *pos;
> struct thermal_zone_device *pos1;
> struct thermal_cooling_device *pos2;
> - unsigned long max_state;
> int result;
>
> if (trip >= tz->trips || (trip < 0 && trip != THERMAL_TRIPS_NONE))
> @@ -939,13 +938,11 @@ int thermal_zone_bind_cooling_device(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> if (tz != pos1 || cdev != pos2)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - cdev->ops->get_max_state(cdev, &max_state);
> -
I am not sure I follow why we need to release this check. Can't the user
use the notifier infrastructure and change the max state?
I think I need a better view of use cases where max state would change.
> - /* lower default 0, upper default max_state */
> + /* lower default 0, upper default THERMAL_CSTATE_MAX */
> lower = lower == THERMAL_NO_LIMIT ? 0 : lower;
> - upper = upper == THERMAL_NO_LIMIT ? max_state : upper;
> + upper = upper == THERMAL_NO_LIMIT ? THERMAL_CSTATE_MAX : upper;
>
> - if (lower > upper || upper > max_state)
> + if (lower > upper)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> dev =
> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> index f7e11c7..3748e6d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>
> /* invalid cooling state */
> #define THERMAL_CSTATE_INVALID -1UL
> +#define THERMAL_CSTATE_MAX 1UL
>
> /* No upper/lower limit requirement */
> #define THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_CSTATE_INVALID
> --
> 1.7.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list