[PATCH v3 RESEND 2/5] ARM: add SMP support for Broadcom mobile SoCs

[Alex Elder]

On 05/15/2014 01:03 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> 2014-05-15 10:58 GMT-07:00 Alex Elder <elder at linaro.org>:
>> This patch adds SMP support for BCM281XX and BCM21664 family SoCs.
>>
>> This feature is controlled with a distinct config option such that a
>> SMP-enabled multi-v7 binary can be configured to run these SoCs in
>> uniprocessor mode.  Since this SMP functionality is used for
>> multiple Broadcom mobile chip families the config option is called
>> ARCH_BCM_MOBILE_SMP (for lack of a better name).
>>
>> On SoCs of this type, the secondary core is not held in reset on
>> power-on.  Instead it loops in a ROM-based holding pen.  To release
>> it, one must write into a special register a jump address whose
>> low-order bits have been replaced with a secondary core's id, then
>> trigger an event with SEV.  On receipt of an event, the ROM code
>> will examine the register's contents, and if the low-order bits
>> match its cpu id, it will clear them and write the value back to the
>> register just prior to jumping to the address specified.
>>
>> The location of the special register is defined in the device tree
>> using a "secondary-boot-reg" property in a node whose "enable-method"
>> matches.
>>
>> Derived from code originally provided by Ray Jui <rjui at broadcom.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig   |  18 +++-
>>  arch/arm/mach-bcm/Makefile  |   3 +
>>  arch/arm/mach-bcm/platsmp.c | 201 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Could we make that name a little bit more specific to the mobile SoCs?

Sure.  I thought about that but naming stuff here has been a sort
of ongoing struggle...  "Kona" made some sense, in some cases,
but it's not perfect.  Simlar with "mobile."

I'll propose "kona_smp.c".  OK with you?  Unless I get a better
suggestion I'll plan to go with that next time around.

Thanks.

					-Alex

> There are other BCM SoCs either currently supported in this directory
> (BCM5310X), or making their way to be supported (brcmstb, bcm63xx),
> and those share nothing with the Mobile SoC SMP code.
> 
> Maybe we should create another level directory within mach-bcm...
>