[PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: add mtk-timer bindings
Matthias Brugger
matthias.bgg at gmail.com
Tue May 13 07:08:42 PDT 2014
2014-05-13 15:08 GMT+02:00 Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann at xilinx.com>:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 01:49AM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>> Add binding documentation for the General Porpose Timer driver of
>> the Mediatek SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/timer/mediatek,mtk-timer.txt | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/mediatek,mtk-timer.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/mediatek,mtk-timer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/mediatek,mtk-timer.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..d0f2df3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/mediatek,mtk-timer.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>> +Mediatek MT6589, MT6577 and MT6572 Timers
>> +---------------------------------------
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: Should be "mediatek,mtk6589-timer"
>> +- reg: Should contain location and length for timers register.
>> +- clocks: phandle to the clock source; the first refers to a 13 MHz fixed
>> + system clock and the second handle to a 32 KHz fixed RTC
>> + clock.
>
> Are these frequencies mandatory to the timer or an implementation
> detail of the SOC you're working with? I suspect, it might be possible
> to see the same timer in a different SOC implementation with different
> frequencies? In that case - or probably in general - the frequencies
> should not be part of the binding, IMHO.
I had a look at the implementation of several Mediatek SoCs and all of
them have the timer with the same clock connections.
I don't know if the IP can be or is actually used with other clocksources.
I can try to reformulate the description to make the clock constraints
sound less mandatory.
Although I would prefer to leave a mention about the clock frequencies
(like e.g. in the allwinner,sun4i-timer).
>
>> +
>> +Examples:
>> +
>> + timer {
>> + compatible = "mediatek,mtk6589-timer";
>> + reg = <0x10008000 0x80>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 113 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>> + clocks = <&system_clk>, <&rtc_clk>;
>
> Might be just my personal preference, but you could also add the clock-names
> property which would relax the ordering requirement a bit and would
> clearly identify the IP's clocks.
In the v1 of the patch series I had the clock names included [1] but
because of comments of others I removed them [1].
Actually the driver just use the first clock, but from my
understanding the DT reflects as well the HW configuration and for
this reason I put the two clocks in the DT.
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/69155/
>
> Sören
--
motzblog.wordpress.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list