[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove suspend_set_ops from common pm late init
Nishanth Menon
nm at ti.com
Fri May 9 12:04:38 PDT 2014
On 05/09/2014 01:53 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> In omap2_common_pm_late_init suspend_set_ops was called to set common
> suspend handling functions for all omap platforms. This created two
> problems. First, these suspend ops were being set for all platforms,
> regardless of whether or not suspend support has been integrated so in
> the case of AM33XX, suspend to mem was presented as available but
> failed every time. Second, some platforms will need to define a
> completely separate set of suspend ops, such as AM33XX, due to
> differences from previous omap platforms so there is no need to
> always set the common omap ops.
>
> This patch moves the suspend_set_ops call from omap2_common_pm_late_init
> into a separate function that then gets called in the omap*_pm_init
> functions for each platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach at ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h | 8 ++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c | 8 ++++----
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> index d88aff7..091e1c7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,14 @@ static inline void omap44xx_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> +void omap_common_suspend_init(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void omap_common_suspend_init(void)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
push this off to this pm.h?
> /* This gets called from mach-omap2/io.c, do not call this */
> void __init omap2_set_globals_tap(u32 class, void __iomem *tap);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> index e1b4141..c9b36fb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> @@ -243,6 +243,10 @@ static const struct platform_suspend_ops omap_pm_ops = {
> .valid = suspend_valid_only_mem,
> };
>
> +void __init omap_common_suspend_init(void)
provide kernel doc please? and do we need __init?
> +{
> + suspend_set_ops(&omap_pm_ops);
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
>
> static void __init omap3_init_voltages(void)
> @@ -310,9 +314,5 @@ int __init omap2_common_pm_late_init(void)
> /* cpufreq dummy device instantiation */
> omap_init_cpufreq();
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> - suspend_set_ops(&omap_pm_ops);
> -#endif
> -
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c
> index 8c07594..8cd2408 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c
> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ static void __init prcm_setup_regs(void)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> omap_pm_suspend = omap2_enter_full_retention;
> + omap_common_suspend_init();
> #endif
>
> /* REVISIT: Configure number of 32 kHz clock cycles for sys_clk
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> index 87099bb..32b2597 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> @@ -707,6 +707,7 @@ int __init omap3_pm_init(void)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> omap_pm_suspend = omap3_pm_suspend;
> + omap_common_suspend_init();
> #endif
>
> arm_pm_idle = omap3_pm_idle;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> index eefb30c..58d7cd7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ int __init omap4_pm_init(void)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> omap_pm_suspend = omap4_pm_suspend;
> + omap_common_suspend_init();
do we need to expose omap_pm_suspend anymore with this since the
original purpose was to make pm.c know about the suspend function?
How about:
omap_common_suspend_init(omap4_pm_suspend);
should do the job, right? and with that, you dont need the #ifdef
CONFIG_SUSPEND either in each of the pmxxx.c files since you already
deal with it in header.
> #endif
>
> /* Overwrite the default cpu_do_idle() */
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list