[PATCH v3 06/19] KVM: ARM: vgic: introduce vgic_ops and LR manipulation primitives

Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall at linaro.org
Fri May 9 07:05:54 PDT 2014


On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:39:38PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In order to split the various register manipulation from the main vgic
> code, introduce a vgic_ops structure, and start by abstracting the
> LR manipulation code with a couple of accessors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> ---
>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h |  18 ++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c    | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index f738e5a..17bbe51 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,24 @@ struct vgic_bytemap {
>  	u32 shared[VGIC_NR_SHARED_IRQS  / 4];
>  };
>  
> +struct kvm_vcpu;
> +
> +#define LR_STATE_PENDING	(1 << 0)
> +#define LR_STATE_ACTIVE		(1 << 1)
> +#define LR_STATE_MASK		(3 << 0)
> +#define LR_EOI_INT		(1 << 2)
> +
> +struct vgic_lr {
> +	u16	irq;
> +	u8	source;
> +	u8	state;
> +};
> +
> +struct vgic_ops {
> +	struct vgic_lr	(*get_lr)(const struct kvm_vcpu *, int);
> +	void	(*set_lr)(struct kvm_vcpu *, int, struct vgic_lr);
> +};
> +
>  struct vgic_dist {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC
>  	spinlock_t		lock;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 6bc6c7a..bac37b8 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -94,9 +94,12 @@ static struct device_node *vgic_node;
>  #define ACCESS_WRITE_MASK(x)	((x) & (3 << 1))
>  
>  static void vgic_retire_disabled_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +static void vgic_retire_lr(int lr_nr, int irq, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  static void vgic_update_state(struct kvm *kvm);
>  static void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm);
>  static void vgic_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 reg);
> +static struct vgic_lr vgic_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr);
> +static void vgic_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr, struct vgic_lr lr_desc);
>  static u32 vgic_nr_lr;
>  
>  static unsigned int vgic_maint_irq;
> @@ -594,18 +597,6 @@ static bool handle_mmio_sgi_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> -#define LR_CPUID(lr)	\
> -	(((lr) & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID) >> GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT)
> -#define LR_IRQID(lr)	\
> -	((lr) & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID)
> -
> -static void vgic_retire_lr(int lr_nr, int irq, struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu)
> -{
> -	clear_bit(lr_nr, vgic_cpu->lr_used);
> -	vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr_nr] &= ~GICH_LR_STATE;
> -	vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[irq] = LR_EMPTY;
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * vgic_unqueue_irqs - move pending IRQs from LRs to the distributor
>   * @vgic_cpu: Pointer to the vgic_cpu struct holding the LRs
> @@ -623,13 +614,10 @@ static void vgic_unqueue_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
>  	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
>  	int vcpu_id = vcpu->vcpu_id;
> -	int i, irq, source_cpu;
> -	u32 *lr;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	for_each_set_bit(i, vgic_cpu->lr_used, vgic_cpu->nr_lr) {
> -		lr = &vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[i];
> -		irq = LR_IRQID(*lr);
> -		source_cpu = LR_CPUID(*lr);
> +		struct vgic_lr lr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, i);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * There are three options for the state bits:
> @@ -641,7 +629,7 @@ static void vgic_unqueue_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		 * If the LR holds only an active interrupt (not pending) then
>  		 * just leave it alone.
>  		 */
> -		if ((*lr & GICH_LR_STATE) == GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT)
> +		if ((lr.state & LR_STATE_MASK) == LR_STATE_ACTIVE)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -650,18 +638,19 @@ static void vgic_unqueue_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		 * is fine, then we are only setting a few bits that were
>  		 * already set.
>  		 */
> -		vgic_dist_irq_set(vcpu, irq);
> -		if (irq < VGIC_NR_SGIS)
> -			dist->irq_sgi_sources[vcpu_id][irq] |= 1 << source_cpu;
> -		*lr &= ~GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT;
> +		vgic_dist_irq_set(vcpu, lr.irq);
> +		if (lr.irq < VGIC_NR_SGIS)
> +			dist->irq_sgi_sources[vcpu_id][lr.irq] |= 1 << lr.source;
> +		lr.state &= ~LR_STATE_PENDING;
> +		vgic_set_lr(vcpu, i, lr);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * If there's no state left on the LR (it could still be
>  		 * active), then the LR does not hold any useful info and can
>  		 * be marked as free for other use.
>  		 */
> -		if (!(*lr & GICH_LR_STATE))
> -			vgic_retire_lr(i, irq, vgic_cpu);
> +		if (!(lr.state & LR_STATE_MASK))
> +			vgic_retire_lr(i, lr.irq, vcpu);
>  
>  		/* Finally update the VGIC state. */
>  		vgic_update_state(vcpu->kvm);
> @@ -989,9 +978,77 @@ static void vgic_update_state(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static struct vgic_lr vgic_v2_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr)
> +{
> +	struct vgic_lr lr_desc;
> +	u32 val = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr];
> +
> +	lr_desc.irq	= val & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID;
> +	lr_desc.source	= (val >> GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT) & 0xff;

shouldn't the mask here be 0xf according to the GICv2 spec?

> +	lr_desc.state	= 0;
> +
> +	if (val & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT)
> +		lr_desc.state |= LR_STATE_PENDING;
> +	if (val & GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT)
> +		lr_desc.state |= LR_STATE_ACTIVE;
> +	if (val & GICH_LR_EOI)
> +		lr_desc.state |= LR_EOI_INT;
> +
> +	return lr_desc;
> +}
> +
>  #define MK_LR_PEND(src, irq)	\
>  	(GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT | ((src) << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT) | (irq))
>  
> +static void vgic_v2_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
> +			   struct vgic_lr lr_desc)
> +{
> +	u32 lr_val = MK_LR_PEND(lr_desc.source, lr_desc.irq);

this looks a bit weird, the check just below suggests that you can
convert a struct vgic_lr into an lr register for, for example, an lr
which is just active and not pending.

> +
> +	if (lr_desc.state & LR_STATE_PENDING)
> +		lr_val |= GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT;
> +	if (lr_desc.state & LR_STATE_ACTIVE)
> +		lr_val |= GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT;
> +	if (lr_desc.state & LR_EOI_INT)
> +		lr_val |= GICH_LR_EOI;
> +
> +	vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] = lr_val;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Despite being EOIed, the LR may not have been marked as
> +	 * empty.
> +	 */
> +	if (!(lr_val & GICH_LR_STATE))
> +		set_bit(lr, (unsigned long *)vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_elrsr);

This feels weird in vgic_v2_set_lr, the name/style suggests that these
get/set functions are just converters from a struct vgic_lr (that
presumably common code can deal with) and architecture-specific LR
register formats.

If these functions have richer semantics than that (like maintaining the
elrsr register), please comment that on the function.

> +}
> +
> +static const struct vgic_ops vgic_ops = {
> +	.get_lr			= vgic_v2_get_lr,
> +	.set_lr			= vgic_v2_set_lr,
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct vgic_lr vgic_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr)
> +{
> +	return vgic_ops.get_lr(vcpu, lr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void vgic_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
> +			       struct vgic_lr vlr)
> +{
> +	vgic_ops.set_lr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
> +}

inline statics in a C file?  Surely the compiler is smart enough to
inline this without any hints.

> +
> +static void vgic_retire_lr(int lr_nr, int irq, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
> +	struct vgic_lr vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr_nr);

seems like we're doing a lot of copying back and forward between the
struct vgic_lr and the LRs on the vgic_cpu struct, I wonder if it makes
more sense to only deal with it during the sync/flush functions, or
maybe we end up messing with more state than necessary then?

> +
> +	vlr.state = 0;
> +	vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr_nr, vlr);
> +	clear_bit(lr_nr, vgic_cpu->lr_used);
> +	vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[irq] = LR_EMPTY;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * An interrupt may have been disabled after being made pending on the
>   * CPU interface (the classic case is a timer running while we're
> @@ -1007,12 +1064,12 @@ static void vgic_retire_disabled_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	int lr;
>  
>  	for_each_set_bit(lr, vgic_cpu->lr_used, vgic_cpu->nr_lr) {
> -		int irq = vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID;
> +		struct vgic_lr vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr);
>  
> -		if (!vgic_irq_is_enabled(vcpu, irq)) {
> -			vgic_retire_lr(lr, irq, vgic_cpu);
> -			if (vgic_irq_is_active(vcpu, irq))
> -				vgic_irq_clear_active(vcpu, irq);
> +		if (!vgic_irq_is_enabled(vcpu, vlr.irq)) {
> +			vgic_retire_lr(lr, vlr.irq, vcpu);
> +			if (vgic_irq_is_active(vcpu, vlr.irq))
> +				vgic_irq_clear_active(vcpu, vlr.irq);
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -1024,6 +1081,7 @@ static void vgic_retire_disabled_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  static bool vgic_queue_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 sgi_source_id, int irq)
>  {
>  	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
> +	struct vgic_lr vlr;
>  	int lr;
>  
>  	/* Sanitize the input... */
> @@ -1036,13 +1094,15 @@ static bool vgic_queue_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 sgi_source_id, int irq)
>  	lr = vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[irq];
>  
>  	/* Do we have an active interrupt for the same CPUID? */
> -	if (lr != LR_EMPTY &&
> -	    (LR_CPUID(vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr]) == sgi_source_id)) {
> -		kvm_debug("LR%d piggyback for IRQ%d %x\n",
> -			  lr, irq, vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr]);
> -		BUG_ON(!test_bit(lr, vgic_cpu->lr_used));
> -		vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] |= GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT;
> -		return true;
> +	if (lr != LR_EMPTY) {
> +		vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr);
> +		if (vlr.source == sgi_source_id) {
> +			kvm_debug("LR%d piggyback for IRQ%d\n", lr, vlr.irq);
> +			BUG_ON(!test_bit(lr, vgic_cpu->lr_used));
> +			vlr.state |= LR_STATE_PENDING;
> +			vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
> +			return true;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Try to use another LR for this interrupt */
> @@ -1052,12 +1112,16 @@ static bool vgic_queue_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 sgi_source_id, int irq)
>  		return false;
>  
>  	kvm_debug("LR%d allocated for IRQ%d %x\n", lr, irq, sgi_source_id);
> -	vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] = MK_LR_PEND(sgi_source_id, irq);
>  	vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[irq] = lr;
>  	set_bit(lr, vgic_cpu->lr_used);
>  
> +	vlr.irq = irq;
> +	vlr.source = sgi_source_id;
> +	vlr.state = LR_STATE_PENDING;
>  	if (!vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, irq))
> -		vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] |= GICH_LR_EOI;
> +		vlr.state |= LR_EOI_INT;
> +
> +	vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
>  
>  	return true;
>  }
> @@ -1180,29 +1244,23 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		 * Some level interrupts have been EOIed. Clear their
>  		 * active bit.
>  		 */
> -		int lr, irq;
> +		int lr;
>  
>  		for_each_set_bit(lr, (unsigned long *)vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_eisr,
>  				 vgic_cpu->nr_lr) {
> -			irq = vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID;
> +			struct vgic_lr vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr);
>  
> -			vgic_irq_clear_active(vcpu, irq);
> -			vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] &= ~GICH_LR_EOI;
> +			vgic_irq_clear_active(vcpu, vlr.irq);
> +			vlr.state = 0;

slight change of semantics here.  It is still correct, but only because
we never set the pending bit on an already active level interrupt, but I
guess this could technically be closer to real hardware by allowing
world-switching VMs that are processing active interrupts to pick up an
additional pending state, in which case just setting state = 0 would be
incorrect here, and you should instead lower the EOI mask like you did
before.

That being said, it is a pseudo-theoretical point, and you can make me
more happy by adding:

BUG_ON(vlr.state & LR_STATE_MASK);

before clearing the state completely.

> +			vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
>  
>  			/* Any additional pending interrupt? */
> -			if (vgic_dist_irq_is_pending(vcpu, irq)) {
> -				vgic_cpu_irq_set(vcpu, irq);
> +			if (vgic_dist_irq_is_pending(vcpu, vlr.irq)) {
> +				vgic_cpu_irq_set(vcpu, vlr.irq);
>  				level_pending = true;
>  			} else {
> -				vgic_cpu_irq_clear(vcpu, irq);
> +				vgic_cpu_irq_clear(vcpu, vlr.irq);
>  			}
> -
> -			/*
> -			 * Despite being EOIed, the LR may not have
> -			 * been marked as empty.
> -			 */
> -			set_bit(lr, (unsigned long *)vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_elrsr);
> -			vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] &= ~GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1228,15 +1286,15 @@ static void __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	/* Clear mappings for empty LRs */
>  	for_each_set_bit(lr, (unsigned long *)vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_elrsr,
>  			 vgic_cpu->nr_lr) {
> -		int irq;
> +		struct vgic_lr vlr;
>  
>  		if (!test_and_clear_bit(lr, vgic_cpu->lr_used))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		irq = vgic_cpu->vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID;
> +		vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr);
>  
> -		BUG_ON(irq >= VGIC_NR_IRQS);
> -		vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[irq] = LR_EMPTY;
> +		BUG_ON(vlr.irq >= VGIC_NR_IRQS);
> +		vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[vlr.irq] = LR_EMPTY;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Check if we still have something up our sleeve... */
> -- 
> 1.8.3.4
> 
-Christoffer



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list