[PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: change to use recommended reset procedure
Sonny Rao
sonnyrao at chromium.org
Thu May 8 18:34:23 PDT 2014
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com> wrote:
> On 05/08/2014 06:40 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote:
>> Any comments on this patch?
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao at chromium.org>
>>>
>>> This patch changes the fifo reset code to follow the reset procedure
>>> outlined in the documentation of Synopsys Mobile storage host databook
>>> 7.2.13.
>>> Without this patch, we could able to see eMMC was not detected after
>>> multiple reboots due to driver hangs while eMMC tuning for HS200.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao at chromium.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd at samsung.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>> index 32dd81d..1d77431 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>> @@ -2220,7 +2220,53 @@ static inline bool dw_mci_fifo_reset(struct dw_mci *host)
>>> host->sg = NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - return dw_mci_ctrl_reset(host, SDMMC_CTRL_FIFO_RESET);
>>> + /*
>>> + * The recommended method for resetting is to always reset the
>>> + * controller and the fifo, but differs slightly depending on the mode.
>>> + * Note that this doesn't handle the "generic DMA" (not IDMAC) case.
>>> + */
>
> "not IDMAC" is confused..
>
The documentation describes three different possible modes. There's a
mode that doesn't use IDMAC but still does DMA. But as far as I can
tell this driver doesn't support that way. We can just remove that
wording if it's confusing.
>>> + if (dw_mci_ctrl_reset(host, SDMMC_CTRL_RESET | SDMMC_CTRL_FIFO_RESET)) {
>>> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(500);
>>> + u32 status, rint;
>>> +
>>> + /* if using dma we wait for dma_req to clear */
>>> + if (host->using_dma) {
>>> + do {
>>> + status = mci_readl(host, STATUS);
>>> + if (!(status & SDMMC_STATUS_DMA_REQ))
>>> + break;
>>> + cpu_relax();
>>> + } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
>>> +
>>> + if (status & SDMMC_STATUS_DMA_REQ)
>>> + dev_err(host->dev,
>>> + "%s: Timeout waiting for dma_req to "
>>> + "clear during reset", __func__);
>>> +
>>> + /* when using DMA next we reset the fifo again */
>>> + dw_mci_ctrl_reset(host, SDMMC_CTRL_FIFO_RESET);
>>> + }
>>> + /*
>>> + * In all cases we clear the RAWINTS register to clear any
>>> + * interrupts.
>>> + */
>>> + rint = mci_readl(host, RINTSTS);
>>> + rint = rint & (~mci_readl(host, MINTSTS));
>
> Just clear the RINTSTS register? why do you add these?
>
This will look at what is not masked, and only clear those bits.
>>> + if (rint)
>>> + mci_writel(host, RINTSTS, rint);
>>> +
>>> + } else
>>> + dev_err(host->dev, "%s: Reset bits didn't clear", __func__);
>
> Just display the error log? I didn't understand this.
> If you displayed the error log, then it needs to return the error value.
>
>>> +
>>> + #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_DW_IDMAC
>>> + /* It is also recommended that we reset and reprogram idmac */
>>> + dw_mci_idmac_reset(host);
>>> + #endif
>>> +
>>> + /* After a CTRL reset we need to have CIU set clock registers */
>>> + mci_send_cmd(host->cur_slot, SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK, 0);
>>> +
>>> + return true;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static inline bool dw_mci_ctrl_all_reset(struct dw_mci *host)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
>>> index 738fa24..037e47a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
>>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@
>>> #define SDMMC_CMD_INDX(n) ((n) & 0x1F)
>>> /* Status register defines */
>>> #define SDMMC_GET_FCNT(x) (((x)>>17) & 0x1FFF)
>>> +#define SDMMC_STATUS_DMA_REQ BIT(31)
>>> /* FIFOTH register defines */
>>> #define SDMMC_SET_FIFOTH(m, r, t) (((m) & 0x7) << 28 | \
>>> ((r) & 0xFFF) << 16 | \
>>> --
>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>
>>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list