[PATCH RFC v3 1/6] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings
sebastian.capella at linaro.org
Thu May 8 16:28:28 PDT 2014
Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-05-08 01:57:43)
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:43:04AM +0100, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> > Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-05-06 11:04:38)
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..196ef52
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
> > > +
> > > +The nodes describing the idle states (state) can only be defined within the
> > > +idle-states node.
> > > +
> > > +Any other configuration is consider invalid and therefore must be ignored.
> > consider -> considered
> > must be -> shall?
> > Is the reference to "any other configuration" referring to state nodes
> > not in the idle states node? If so, maybe this sentence should go
> > together with that one.
> Yes, it makes sense.
With this small change you can add my Reviewed-by
More information about the linux-arm-kernel