[PATCH resend 00/15] arm64 crypto roundup
Ard Biesheuvel
ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org
Thu May 8 04:22:33 PDT 2014
On 7 May 2014 16:45, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:32PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> This is a repost of the arm64 crypto patches that I have posted to the LAKML
>> over the past months. They have now been verified on actual hardware
>> (Cortex-A57) so if there are no remaining issues I would like to propose them
>> for 3.16.
>>
>> Ard Biesheuvel (15):
>> asm-generic: allow generic unaligned access if the arch supports it
>> arm64: add abstractions for FPSIMD state manipulation
>> arm64: defer reloading a task's FPSIMD state to userland resume
>> arm64: add support for kernel mode NEON in interrupt context
>> arm64/crypto: SHA-1 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions
>> arm64/crypto: SHA-224/SHA-256 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions
>> arm64/crypto: GHASH secure hash using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions
>> arm64/crypto: AES using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions
>> arm64/crypto: AES in CCM mode using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions
>> arm64: pull in <asm/simd.h> from asm-generic
>> arm64/crypto: AES-ECB/CBC/CTR/XTS using ARMv8 NEON and Crypto
>> Extensions
>> arm64/crypto: add shared macro to test for NEED_RESCHED
>> arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA1
>> arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA2
>> arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions GHASH
>
> There are about 5 patches that make sense to me ;) and apart from a few
> minor comments they look fine.
>
> There are the other 10 crypto patches that are beyond my knowledge. Do
> you know anyone who could do a sanity check on them? Are there any tests
> that would show the correctness of the implementation?
>
I will re-send the 3 FPSIMD patches separately with your review
comments addressed.
--
Ard.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list