[PATCH 134/222] ARM: imx: keep PLLs in bypass while they're locking
Dirk Behme
dirk.behme at de.bosch.com
Thu May 8 01:59:28 PDT 2014
Besides the question below regarding 'val & BM_PLL_POWER', three
additional questions:
On 30.04.2014 12:52, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 25.04.2014 13:42, Russell King wrote:
>> Keep the PLL bypassed while we prepare a clock by powering up the PLL,
>> otherwise we can end up with improper output/gitches which prevents
>> further operation.
Have you seen a real world case to show this patch fixes an issue in
real? Have you been seeing anything like "improper output/gitches"?
>> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
>> index 61364050fccd..3776f974d1dc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
>> @@ -273,9 +273,10 @@ static int clk_pllv3_av_set_rate(struct clk_hw
We touch here pllv3/av only, while the commit message generically says
"keep PLLs in bypass while they're locking" nothing specific to
audio/video PLL clock. So isn't similar modification needed for the
other set_rate() functions as well?
>> *hw, unsigned long rate,
>> struct clk_pllv3 *pll = to_clk_pllv3(hw);
>> unsigned long min_rate = parent_rate * 27;
>> unsigned long max_rate = parent_rate * 54;
>> - u32 val, div;
>> + u32 val, newval, div;
>> u32 mfn, mfd = 1000000;
>> s64 temp64;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> if (rate < min_rate || rate > max_rate)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -287,13 +288,27 @@ static int clk_pllv3_av_set_rate(struct clk_hw
>> *hw, unsigned long rate,
>> mfn = temp64;
>>
>> val = readl_relaxed(pll->base);
>> - val &= ~pll->div_mask;
>> - val |= div;
>> - writel_relaxed(val, pll->base);
>> +
>> + /* set the PLL into bypass mode */
>> + newval = val | BM_PLL_BYPASS;
>> + writel_relaxed(newval, pll->base);
>> +
>> + /* configure the new frequency */
Reading the i.MX6 reference manual section '18.5.1.5.3 PLL clock
change': 'Before changing the PLL setting, power it down. Power up the
PLL after the change.' So we need to power down/up the PLL rather than
just bypass for a rate change?
>> + newval &= ~pll->div_mask;
>> + newval |= div;
>> + writel_relaxed(newval, pll->base);
>> writel_relaxed(mfn, pll->base + PLL_NUM_OFFSET);
>> - writel_relaxed(mfd, pll->base + PLL_DENOM_OFFSET);
>> + writel(mfd, pll->base + PLL_DENOM_OFFSET);
>>
>> - return clk_pllv3_wait_lock(pll);
>> + ret = clk_pllv3_wait_lock(pll);
>> + if (ret == 0 && val & BM_PLL_POWER) {
>
> I'm no expert on this, so sorry if I'm wrong ;)
>
> But regarding the check 'val & BM_PLL_POWER' here:
>
> Reading the manual, it seems that both PLL4_AUDIO & PLL5_VIDEO don't
> have a POWER bit, instead they have a POWERDOWN at bit 12. So for
> PLL4_AUDIO & PLL5_VIDEO 'val & BM_PLL_POWER' would mean not powered up?
>
> Maybe the check should be done anywhere else, e.g. in clk_pllv3_set_rate()?
Best regards
Dirk
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list