[PATCH v3 17/20] phy: Add support for USB cluster on the Armada 375 SoC

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Andrew Lunn,

On Tue, 6 May 2014 15:54:27 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> > +enum {
> > +	PHY_USB2 = 0,
> > +	PHY_USB3 = 1,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct armada375_cluster_phy {
> > +	struct phy *phy;
> > +	void __iomem *reg;
> > +	bool enable;
> > +	bool use_usb3;
> 
> Hi Gregory
> 
> nit: How about using the enum you just defined?

Nope, I don't think it's a good idea, because they mean different
things. The enum is used to index the arrays of two PHYs: PHY_USB2 is
the first one, PHY_USB3 is the second one.

On the other hand, the 'use_usb3' field indicates in which mode is a
particular PHY. So it could apply on either of the PHYs, and is
therefore not related to the index of the PHYs in the array.


> > +	usb_cluster_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> 
> devm_ API?
> 
> Check the return value for an error?

Indeed, I'll use devm_ioremap_resource() here.

> > +	BUG_ON(!usb_cluster_base);
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < NB_PHY; i++) {
> > +		phy = devm_phy_create(dev, &armada375_usb_phy_ops, NULL);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(phy))
> > +			dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY n%d\n", i);
> > +
> > +		usb_cluster_phy[i].phy = phy;
> > +		usb_cluster_phy[i].reg = usb_cluster_base;
> > +		usb_cluster_phy[i].enable = false;
> > +		phy_set_drvdata(phy, &usb_cluster_phy[i]);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	usb_cluster_phy[PHY_USB2].use_usb3 = false;
> > +	usb_cluster_phy[PHY_USB3].use_usb3 = true;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We can't use the first usb2 unit and usb3 at the same time
> > +	 * to manage a USB2 device, so let's disable usb2 if usb3 is
> > +	 * slelected. In this case USB2 device will be managed by the
> 
> selected

Fixed.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com