mx6qsabresd hangs on linux-next
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at freescale.com
Tue May 6 20:32:24 PDT 2014
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:09:51AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:00:29PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 06:04:45PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > > Hi Fabio,
> > >
> > > On 05/06/2014 05:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > >On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Indeed, if I revert:
> > > >>
> > > >>commit e7489693b3a853ab6dfad52f7e6af553ae8d3f28
> > > >>Author: Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coquelin at st.com>
> > > >>Date: Wed Jan 29 17:24:08 2014 +0100
> > > >>
> > > >> clk: divider: Optimize clk_divider_bestdiv loop
> > > >>
> > > >> Currently, the for-loop used to try all the different dividers to find the
> > > >> one that best fit tries all the values from 1 to max_div,
> > > >>incrementing by one.
> > > >> In case of power-of-two, or table based divider, the loop isn't optimal.
> > > >>
> > > >> Instead of incrementing by one, this patch provides directly the
> > > >>next divider.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at st.com>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org>
> > > >>
> > > >>Then the board does not hang.
> > > >
> > > >Isn't the increment of i missing?
> > >
> > > i is incremented in _next_div():
> > >
> > > +static int _next_div(struct clk_divider *divider, int div)
> > > +{
> > > + div++;
> > > +
> > > + if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
> > > + return __roundup_pow_of_two(div);
> > > + if (divider->table)
> > > + return _round_up_table(divider->table, div);
> > > +
> > > + return div;
> > > +}
> >
> > This cannot work. _round_up_table is implemented like this:
> >
> > static int _round_up_table(const struct clk_div_table *table, int div)
> > {
> > const struct clk_div_table *clkt;
> > int up = _get_table_maxdiv(table);
> >
> > for (clkt = table; clkt->div; clkt++) {
> > if (clkt->div == div)
> > return clkt->div;
> > ...
> > }
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Here when a table entry matches the input div this function will return
> > exactly the input div. This means _next_div() will always return the
> > same value and clk_divider_bestdiv() has an infinite loop:
> >
> > for (i = 1; i <= maxdiv; i = _next_div(divider, i)) {
> > ...
> > }
>
> Hmmm, isn't the first thing that _next_div() does to increment the input
> div?
I think the infinite loop happens in this case because "i" will never
exceed maxdiv for a table divider.
Shawn
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list