[PATCHv5 01/15] Documentation: dt: add common bindings for hwspinlock

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com> wrote:
> This patch adds the generic common bindings used to represent
> a hwlock device and use/request locks in a device-tree build.
>
> All the platform-specific hwlock driver implementations need the
> number of locks and associated base id for registering the locks
> present within the device with the driver core. The number of locks
> is represented by 'hwlock-num-locks' property in DT bindings. A
> property for base id is not needed in DT binding, as it can be
> satisfied using a phandle + args specifier. The args specifier
> length is dependent on each vendor-specific implementation and
> is represented through the '#hwlock-cells' property.
>
> Note that the document is named hwlock.txt deliberately to keep it
> a bit more generic.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.txt          | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..32381cc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +Generic hwlock bindings
> +=======================
> +
> +Generic bindings that are common to all the hwlock platform specific driver
> +implementations, the retrieved values are used for registering the device
> +specific parameters with the hwspinlock core.
> +
> +The validity and need of these common properties may vary from one platform
> +implementation to another. The platform specific bindings should explicitly
> +state if a property is mandatory or optional. Please look through the
> +individual platform specific hwlock binding documentations for identifying
> +the applicable properties.
> +
> +Common properties:
> +- #hwlock-cells:       Specifies the number of cells needed to represent a
> +                       specific lock.

This should never be optional.

> +- hwlock-num-locks:    Number of locks present in a hwlock device. This
> +                       property is needed on hwlock devices, where the number
> +                       of supported locks within a hwlock device cannot be
> +                       read from a register.

Do you have any users of this? The omap binding doesn't use it.
Wouldn't you typically know this based on the IP block? Similarly you
typically don't have to list how many irqs an interrupt controller
has.


> +
> +Hwlock Users:
> +=============
> +
> +Nodes that require specific hwlock(s) should specify them using one or more
> +properties, each containing a phandle to the hwlock node and an args specifier
> +value as indicated by #hwlock-cells. Multiple hwlocks can be requested using
> +an array of the phandle and hwlock number specifier tuple.
> +
> +1. Example of a node using a single specific hwlock:
> +
> +The following example has a node requesting a hwlock in the bank defined by
> +the node hwlock1. hwlock1 is a hwlock provider with an argument specifier
> +of length 1.
> +
> +       node {
> +               ...
> +               hwlocks = <&hwlock1 2>;
> +               ...
> +       };
> +
> +2. Example of a node using multiple specific hwlocks:
> +
> +The following example has a node requesting two hwlocks, a hwlock within
> +the hwlock device node 'hwlock1' with #hwlock-cells value of 1, and another
> +hwlock within the hwlock device node 'hwlock2' with #hwlock-cells value of 2.
> +
> +       node {
> +               ...
> +               hwlocks = <&hwlock1 2>, <&hwlock2 0 3>;
> +               ...
> +       };
> --
> 1.9.2
>