[RFC PATCH v2 03/10] ARM: at91: introduce OLD_IRQ_AT91 Kconfig option
Boris BREZILLON
b.brezillon.dev at gmail.com
Sat Mar 29 05:52:56 EDT 2014
Le 29/03/2014 10:12, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Saturday 29 March 2014 10:06:39 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Dear Boris BREZILLON,
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:59:01 +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>>
>>> +config OLD_IRQ_AT91
>>> + bool
>>> + default false
>> I don't think "default false" is a valid Kconfig construct. It could be
>> "default n", but that's useless since "default n" is the default
>> behavior. So I believe you can simply get rid of that line.
I'll fix it for the next version.
> I think the above is syntactically correct, but it would be highly confusing in
> anyone ever does
>
> config false
> def_bool y
>
> ;-)
>
> Aside from that, these three have completely identical meaning:
>
> config OLD_IRQ_AT91
> bool
>
> config OLD_IRQ_AT91
> def_bool n
>
> config OLD_IRQ_AT91
> bool
> default n
>
> Arnd
>
>
Thanks for the detailled explanation :-).
Best Regards,
Boris
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list