[PATCH 2/3] ARM: kprobes: Disallow instructions with PC and register specified shift
David Long
dave.long at linaro.org
Mon Mar 24 15:49:28 EDT 2014
On 03/11/14 12:54, Jon Medhurst wrote:
> ARM data processing instructions which have a register specified shift
> are defined as UNPREDICTABLE if PC is used for any register, not just
> the shift value as the code was previous assuming. This issue manifests
> on A15 devices as either test case failures or undefined instructions
> aborts.
>
> Reported-by: David Long <dave.long at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test-arm.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
> arch/arm/kernel/probes-arm.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test-arm.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test-arm.c
> index 87839de..8a7428b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test-arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test-arm.c
> @@ -73,12 +73,9 @@ void kprobe_arm_test_cases(void)
> TEST_RRR( op "lt" s " r11, r",11,VAL1,", r",14,N(val),", asr r",7, 6,"")\
> TEST_RR( op "gt" s " r12, r13" ", r",14,val, ", ror r",14,7,"")\
> TEST_RR( op "le" s " r14, r",0, val, ", r13" ", lsl r",14,8,"")\
> - TEST_RR( op s " r12, pc" ", r",14,val, ", ror r",14,7,"")\
> - TEST_RR( op s " r14, r",0, val, ", pc" ", lsl r",14,8,"")\
> TEST_R( op "eq" s " r0, r",11,VAL1,", #0xf5") \
> TEST_R( op "ne" s " r11, r",0, VAL1,", #0xf5000000") \
> - TEST_R( op s " r7, r",8, VAL2,", #0x000af000") \
> - TEST( op s " r4, pc" ", #0x00005a00")
The last two lines above confuse me. Can you explain why those needed
to be removed? Is there somehow a shift involved with those instructions?
The rest looked OK to me. I'm omitting it for the sake of brevity.
-dl
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list