[PATCH] ARM: topology: Make it clear that all CPUs need to be described

[Mark Rutland]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:59:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Mark Brown <broonie at linaro.org>
> 
> The ARMv8 code will reject topologies that omit some CPUs (and it's not
> clear that it's ever sensible to do so). Update the binding document to
> make this clear.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt
> index 4aa20e7a424e..1bd5edc225c1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt
> @@ -75,9 +75,10 @@ The cpu-map node can only contain three types of child nodes:
>  
>  whose bindings are described in paragraph 3.
>  
> -The nodes describing the CPU topology (cluster/core/thread) can only be
> -defined within the cpu-map node.
> -Any other configuration is consider invalid and therefore must be ignored.
> +The nodes describing the CPU topology (cluster/core/thread) can only
> +be defined within the cpu-map node and every core/thread in the system
> +must be defined within the topology.  Any other configuration is
> +consider invalid and therefore must be ignored.

s/consider/considered/ (or drop the word entirely?).

Otherwise this looks sane to me, given there are currently no users of
this information relying on partial topology descriptions.

Cheers,
Mark.