[PATCH] ASoC: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in DT documentation
Robert Nelson
robertcnelson at gmail.com
Thu Mar 20 11:15:25 EDT 2014
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf at free.fr> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:31:10 +0000
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> 1. change the DT compatible strings the driver has to accept both
>> nxp,tda19988 and nxp,tda19989, and set the appropriate device
>> in the DT file (tda19988). I'm a bit nervous about using
>> "nxp,tda1998x" in case we're clashing with devices with different
>> characteristics.
>
> The Cubox is sold with either the TDA19988 or the TDA19989 (I don't
> know about the AMX33XX boards). Then, setting the exact type in the DT
> would ask for 2 differents DTs or for having two tda998x definitions in
> a same DT...
fyi:
On the AM335x (BeagleBone Black), the NXP's chip ink shows, 88BHN so TDA19988
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list