[PATCH] cpufreq: remove unused notifier: CPUFREQ_{SUSPENDCHANGE|RESUMECHANGE}

Rafael J. Wysocki rjw at rjwysocki.net
Wed Mar 19 09:27:01 EDT 2014


On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:22:01 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 03/19/2014 11:24 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Two cpufreq notifiers CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE and CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE were unused
> > since sometime. And so better remove them to clean code a bit.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat at linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Queued up for 3.15, thanks!


> > ---
> >  Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt       | 4 ----
> >  arch/arm/kernel/smp.c                 | 3 +--
> >  arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c             | 2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c             | 3 ---
> >  arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c | 3 +--
> >  arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c           | 3 +--
> >  arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c                 | 3 +--
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c             | 3 +--
> >  drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c          | 3 ---
> >  drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c           | 3 +--
> >  include/linux/cpufreq.h               | 2 --
> >  11 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt b/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt
> > index ce0666e..0060d76 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt
> > @@ -92,7 +92,3 @@ values:
> >  cpu	- number of the affected CPU
> >  old	- old frequency
> >  new	- new frequency
> > -
> > -If the cpufreq core detects the frequency has changed while the system
> > -was suspended, these notifiers are called with CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE as
> > -second argument.
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> > index b7b4c86..7c4fada 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -674,8 +674,7 @@ static int cpufreq_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> >  	}
> > 
> >  	if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE  && freq->old < freq->new) ||
> > -	    (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new) ||
> > -	    (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE || val == CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE)) {
> > +	    (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new)) {
> >  		loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(global_l_p_j_ref,
> >  						global_l_p_j_ref_freq,
> >  						freq->new);
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> > index 6591e26..dfc3213 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> > @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int twd_cpufreq_transition(struct notifier_block *nb,
> >  	 * frequency.  The timer is local to a cpu, so cross-call to the
> >  	 * changing cpu.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (state == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE || state == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)
> > +	if (state == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)
> >  		smp_call_function_single(freqs->cpu, twd_update_frequency,
> >  			NULL, 1);
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c
> > index 29905b1..41f27f6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c
> > @@ -885,9 +885,6 @@ static int viper_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> >  			viper_set_core_cpu_voltage(freq->new, 0);
> >  		}
> >  		break;
> > -	case CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE:
> > -		viper_set_core_cpu_voltage(freq->new, 0);
> > -		break;
> >  	default:
> >  		/* ignore */
> >  		break;
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c b/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c
> > index 1f0ebde..863d893 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c
> > @@ -1121,8 +1121,7 @@ oprof_cpufreq_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *data)
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  	struct cpufreq_freqs *frq = data;
> >  	if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && frq->old < frq->new) ||
> > -	    (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && frq->old > frq->new) ||
> > -	    (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE || val == CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE))
> > +	    (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && frq->old > frq->new))
> >  		set_spu_profiling_frequency(frq->new, spu_cycle_reset);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c
> > index c3d82b5..b397e05 100644
> > --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c
> > @@ -659,8 +659,7 @@ static int sparc64_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val
> >  		ft->clock_tick_ref = cpu_data(cpu).clock_tick;
> >  	}
> >  	if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE  && freq->old < freq->new) ||
> > -	    (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new) ||
> > -	    (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)) {
> > +	    (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new)) {
> >  		cpu_data(cpu).clock_tick =
> >  			cpufreq_scale(ft->clock_tick_ref,
> >  				      ft->ref_freq,
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > index cfbe99f..7a9296a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > @@ -914,8 +914,7 @@ static int time_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
> >  		tsc_khz_ref = tsc_khz;
> >  	}
> >  	if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE  && freq->old < freq->new) ||
> > -			(val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new) ||
> > -			(val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)) {
> > +			(val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new)) {
> >  		*lpj = cpufreq_scale(loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freq->new);
> > 
> >  		tsc_khz = cpufreq_scale(tsc_khz_ref, ref_freq, freq->new);
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index bf7f9c2..d0f0b7b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -264,8 +264,7 @@ static void adjust_jiffies(unsigned long val, struct cpufreq_freqs *ci)
> >  		pr_debug("saving %lu as reference value for loops_per_jiffy; freq is %u kHz\n",
> >  			 l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq);
> >  	}
> > -	if ((val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && ci->old != ci->new) ||
> > -	    (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE || val == CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE)) {
> > +	if (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && ci->old != ci->new) {
> >  		loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq,
> >  								ci->new);
> >  		pr_debug("scaling loops_per_jiffy to %lu for frequency %u kHz\n",
> > diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c b/drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c
> > index 6eecd7c..54d3089 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c
> > @@ -125,9 +125,6 @@ sa1100_pcmcia_frequency_change(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt,
> >  		if (freqs->new < freqs->old)
> >  			sa1100_pcmcia_set_mecr(skt, freqs->new);
> >  		break;
> > -	case CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE:
> > -		sa1100_pcmcia_set_mecr(skt, freqs->new);
> > -		break;
> >  	}
> > 
> >  	return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > index be33d2b..7e0b626 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > @@ -1041,8 +1041,7 @@ static int sci_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
> > 
> >  	sci_port = container_of(self, struct sci_port, freq_transition);
> > 
> > -	if ((phase == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE) ||
> > -	    (phase == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)) {
> > +	if (phase == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE) {
> >  		struct uart_port *port = &sci_port->port;
> > 
> >  		spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > index e5cebce..4c3bcdc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > @@ -320,8 +320,6 @@ static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {}
> >  /* Transition notifiers */
> >  #define CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE		(0)
> >  #define CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE		(1)
> > -#define CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE		(8)
> > -#define CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE		(9)
> > 
> >  /* Policy Notifiers  */
> >  #define CPUFREQ_ADJUST			(0)
> > 
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list