[linux-next][regression] [PATCH] percpu: add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops
Grygorii Strashko
grygorii.strashko at ti.com
Wed Mar 19 07:18:52 EDT 2014
On 03/18/2014 11:37 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:54:06 -0500 (CDT) Christoph Lameter <cl at linux.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>
>>> Any way, I can boot and console works fine with your change :)
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Ok here is the properly formatted patch:
>>
>>
>> Subject: preemption_checks: Avoid snprintf before checking error conditions
>>
>> snprintf can cause hangs.
>
> This is weird. How the heck can snprintf() fail if called too early?
> All it does is shuffle chars around in memory. The only external
> dependency I'm seeing is a WARN_ON() which presumably didn't trigger
> anyway.
>
> I'm suspecting a misdiagnosis here. Otherwise, we seriously need to
> fix snprintf(), not work around it!
Not sure I can run debugger fast :(, but I'll try.
>
> Also, what does "before checking error conditions" refer to? Does this
> mean you know why snprintf() failed??
Just an assumption, May be the problem here not in snprintf, but in stack.
Looks like if I reduce stack usage the issue is gone:
char text[10];
>
>> Move the string processing into the function
>> so that the string operations only occur when necessary after the
>> conditions have been checked.
>>
>> Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko at ti.com>
>
> Grygorii, thanks for testing linux-next on unusual machines - it's most
> helpful.
>
Regards,
-grygorii
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list