linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm-soc tree
Sören Brinkmann
soren.brinkmann at xilinx.com
Mon Mar 17 12:41:18 EDT 2014
On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 04:35PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig between commit ddb902cc3459 ("ARM: centralize
> common multi-platform kconfig options") from the arm-soc tree and commit
> cd325295871f ("arm: zynq: Add support for cpufreq") from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr at canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig
> index 105d39b72a25,f03e75bd0b2b..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig
> @@@ -2,10 -2,19 +2,12 @@@ config ARCH_ZYN
> bool "Xilinx Zynq ARM Cortex A9 Platform" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
> select ARM_AMBA
> select ARM_GIC
> + select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
> + select ARCH_HAS_OPP
> - select COMMON_CLK
> - select CPU_V7
> - select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
> select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP
> select ICST
> - select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
The two conflicting patches mentioned above don't touch this line, I
think. I'm not sure whether this should go away.
Apart from this, things look okay to me.
Thanks,
Sören
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list