[PATCH v2 1/2] irqchip: sun4i: Use handle_fasteoi_irq for all interrupts
Maxime Ripard
maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com
Mon Mar 17 07:12:13 EDT 2014
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 04:04:53PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Since the sun4i irq chip does not require any action and clears the interrupt
> when the level goes back to inactive, we don't need to mask / unmask for
> non oneshot IRQs, to achieve this we make sun4i_irq_ack a nop for all irqs
> except irq 0 and use handle_fasteoi_irq for all interrupts.
>
> Now there might be a case when the device reactivates the interrupt
> before the RETI. But that does not matter as we run the primary
> interrupt handlers with interrupts disabled.
>
> This also allows us to get rid of needing to use 2 irq_chip structs, this
> means that the IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED | IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED will now influence
> all interrupts rather then just irq 0, but that does not matter as the eoi
> is now a nop anyways for all interrupts but irq 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c | 18 ++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> index a0ed1ea..6a8c88d 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ static void sun4i_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
> int reg = irq / 32;
> u32 val;
>
> + if (irq != 0)
> + return; /* Only IRQ 0 / the ENMI needs to be acked */
> +
> val = readl(sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
> writel(val | (1 << irq_off),
> sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
> @@ -76,13 +79,6 @@ static void sun4i_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
>
> static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip = {
> .name = "sun4i_irq",
> - .irq_mask = sun4i_irq_mask,
> - .irq_unmask = sun4i_irq_unmask,
> -};
> -
> -/* IRQ 0 / the ENMI needs a late eoi call */
> -static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip_enmi = {
> - .name = "sun4i_irq",
> .irq_eoi = sun4i_irq_ack,
> .irq_mask = sun4i_irq_mask,
> .irq_unmask = sun4i_irq_unmask,
> @@ -92,13 +88,7 @@ static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip_enmi = {
> static int sun4i_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
> irq_hw_number_t hw)
> {
> - if (hw == 0)
> - irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip_enmi,
> - handle_fasteoi_irq);
> - else
> - irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip,
> - handle_level_irq);
> -
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
> set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
Oh.. And you just did. Nevermind then.
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com>
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140317/9e29c0b5/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list