Re: [PATCH v7][ 3/5] video: mx3fb: Introduce regulator support.

Alexander Shiyan shc_work at mail.ru
Fri Mar 14 05:23:55 EDT 2014


Пятница, 14 марта 2014, 10:12 +01:00 от Denis Carikli <denis at eukrea.com>:
> This commit is based on the following commit by Fabio Estevam:
>   4344429 video: mxsfb: Introduce regulator support
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Carikli <denis at eukrea.com>
> ---
...
> +	if (np) {
> +		if (regulator_name)
> +			mx3fbi->reg_lcd = regulator_get(NULL, regulator_name);
> +
> +		if (IS_ERR(mx3fbi->reg_lcd))
> +			return PTR_ERR(mx3fbi->reg_lcd);
> +	} else {
> +		/* Permit that driver without a regulator in non-dt mode */
> +		mx3fbi->reg_lcd = regulator_get(dev, "lcd");
> +	}

I am still completely do not understand why do you need to have
"regulator_name" property?
Why this cannot be devm_regulator_get(dev, "lcd") in both DT and non-DT case?

---


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list