[PATCH 1/3] irqchip: sun4i: Don't mask + unmask for the non oneshot case
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Thu Mar 13 15:50:00 EDT 2014
Since sun4i and sun5i are single core SOCs there is no need to mask non
oneshot IRQs, to achieve this we use handle_fasteoi_irq with a dummy eoi.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
index a0ed1ea..0a71990 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
@@ -74,8 +74,17 @@ static void sun4i_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_ENABLE_REG(reg));
}
+/*
+ * Since sun4i and sun5i are single core SOCs there is no need to mask non
+ * oneshot IRQs, to achieve this we use handle_fasteoi_irq with a dummy eoi.
+ */
+static void sun4i_irq_dummy_eoi(struct irq_data *irqd)
+{
+}
+
static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip = {
.name = "sun4i_irq",
+ .irq_eoi = sun4i_irq_dummy_eoi,
.irq_mask = sun4i_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = sun4i_irq_unmask,
};
@@ -97,7 +106,7 @@ static int sun4i_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
handle_fasteoi_irq);
else
irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip,
- handle_level_irq);
+ handle_fasteoi_irq);
set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
--
1.9.0
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list