[PATCH] ARM64: Kernel managed pages are only flushed

Laura Abbott lauraa at codeaurora.org
Wed Mar 12 16:12:31 EDT 2014


On 3/12/2014 10:26 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 04:03:40PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:56:53PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:41:31PM +0000, Bharat.Bhushan at freescale.com wrote:
>>>> Did you get the chance to look into this? What is your take for this patch
>>>> or you want to suggest some other solution?
>>>
>>> See my reply to Laura here:
>>>
>>>    http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/238510.html
>>>
>>> We *really* don't want executable device mappings.
>>
>> /dev/mem mapping use pgprot_noncached() but I think we could generalise
>> any of the writecombine and dmacoherent mappings to XN like in the patch
>> below:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index b524dcd17243..2d3cede62709 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -286,11 +286,11 @@ static inline int has_transparent_hugepage(void)
>>    * Mark the prot value as uncacheable and unbufferable.
>>    */
>>   #define pgprot_noncached(prot) \
>> -	__pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE))
>> +	__pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE) | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
>>   #define pgprot_writecombine(prot) \
>> -	__pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC))
>> +	__pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC) | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
>>   #define pgprot_dmacoherent(prot) \
>> -	__pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC))
>> +	__pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC) | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
>>   #define __HAVE_PHYS_MEM_ACCESS_PROT
>>   struct file;
>>   extern pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
>
> And one more patch as suggested by Steve Capper. Both would be needed.
>
> -------------8<----------------------
>
>  From 31d84855d71778e4a0f615f61ab836be3a70a58b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:28:09 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Do not synchronise I and D caches for special ptes
>
> Special pte mappings are not intended to be executable and do not even
> have an associated struct page. This patch ensures that we do not call
> __sync_icache_dcache() on such ptes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Reported-by: Steve Capper <Steve.Capper at arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 2d3cede62709..72c9ac38cdd9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>   			      pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>   {
>   	if (pte_valid_user(pte)) {
> -		if (pte_exec(pte))
> +		if (!pte_special(pte) && pte_exec(pte))
>   			__sync_icache_dcache(pte, addr);
>   		if (pte_dirty(pte) && pte_write(pte))
>   			pte_val(pte) &= ~PTE_RDONLY;
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>

Both let my simple test case pass (remap_pfn_range on io memory).
You can add my Tested-by to both patches.

Thanks,
Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list