[PATCHv4 2/2] arm: Get rid of meminfo

[Grygorii Strashko]

Hi Russell,

On 03/12/2014 10:54 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:15:33PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> memblock is now fully integrated into the kernel and is the prefered
>> method for tracking memory. Rather than reinvent the wheel with
>> meminfo, migrate to using memblock directly instead of meminfo as
>> an intermediate.
>>
>> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason at lakedaemon.net>
>> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>
>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski at samsung.com>
>> Tested-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa at codeaurora.org>
>
> Laura,
>
> This patch causes a bunch of platforms to no longer boot - imx6solo with
> 1GB of RAM boots, imx6q with 2GB of RAM doesn't.  Versatile Express doesn't.
>
> The early printk messages don't reveal anything too interesting:
>
> Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
> Linux version 3.14.0-rc6+ (rmk at rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk) (gcc version 4.6.4 (GCC) ) #630 SMP Wed Mar 12 01:13:36 GMT 2014
> CPU: ARMv7 Processor [412fc09a] revision 10 (ARMv7), cr=10c53c7d
> CPU: PIPT / VIPT nonaliasing data cache, VIPT aliasing instruction cache
> Machine model: SolidRun Cubox-i Dual/Quad
> cma: CMA: reserved 64 MiB at 8c000000
> Memory policy: Data cache writealloc
> <hang>
>
> vs.
>
> Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
> Linux version 3.14.0-rc6+ (rmk at rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk) (gcc version 4.6.4 (GCC) ) #631 SMP Wed Mar 12 01:15:37 GMT 2014
> CPU: ARMv7 Processor [412fc09a] revision 10 (ARMv7), cr=10c53c7d
> CPU: PIPT / VIPT nonaliasing data cache, VIPT aliasing instruction cache
> Machine model: SolidRun Cubox-i Dual/Quad
> cma: CMA: reserved 64 MiB at 3b800000
> Memory policy: Data cache writealloc
> On node 0 totalpages: 524288
> free_area_init_node: node 0, pgdat c09d0240, node_mem_map ea7d8000
>    Normal zone: 1520 pages used for memmap
>    Normal zone: 0 pages reserved
>    Normal zone: 194560 pages, LIFO batch:31
>    HighMem zone: 2576 pages used for memmap
>    HighMem zone: 329728 pages, LIFO batch:31
> ...
>
> The only obvious difference is the address of that CMA reservation,
> CMA shouldn't make a difference here - but I suspect that other
> allocations which need to be in lowmem probably aren't.
>

Could it be possible to enable memblock debug by adding "memblock=debug" 
in cmdline?

Regards,
-grygorii