[PATCH v3 2/5] mfd: add bcm590xx pmu driver

[Matt Porter]

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:45:17PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > Add a driver for the BCM590xx PMU multi-function devices. The driver
> > > > initially supports regmap initialization and instantiation of the
> > > > voltage regulator device function of the PMU.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter at linaro.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger at linaro.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Markus Mayer <markus.mayer at linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  8 ++++
> > > >  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |  1 +
> > > >  drivers/mfd/bcm590xx.c       | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  include/linux/mfd/bcm590xx.h | 31 +++++++++++++++
> > > >  4 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/bcm590xx.c
> > > >  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/bcm590xx.h
> > > 
> > > I have a tiny nit that 'ret' doesn't need to be initialised before
> > > use in probe(), but apart from that...
> > > 
> > > Looks pretty sensible:
> > >   Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> > 
> > Ok, thanks. When I get back in front of my desktop I'll send a v4 of
> > just this patch to address that nit. Mark already applied the regulator
> > driver from this series, will you be taking this through your tree? For
> > that matter, I wonder if the binding would also go through your tree
> > with this driver.
> 
> At least the MFD portion and the DT binding doc will go through the
> MFD tree.
> 
> Are there any inter-patch dependencies in the set? If so, we should
> know about them so we can coordinate a sensible solution.

Yes, the regulator driver (3/5) that Mark applied is dependent on this
patch...the regulator driver includes include/linux/mfd/bcm590xx.h.

-Matt